Excessive Order Engineering and Customization Costs
Definition
In Engineer-to-Order (ETO) configuration management, each customer order requires unique engineering from scratch or heavy modifications, leading to prolonged engineering cycles that extend project timelines by weeks or months. This results in non-optimized design-to-cost, lack of repetition in production, and interrupted learning curves due to constant design changes. Manual processes cause resource occupation on repetitive tasks instead of innovation, escalating operational expenses across the value chain.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 20-40% excess engineering costs
- Frequency: Per order - recurring with each custom project
- Root Cause: Incomplete product development, tendency to invent during sales, and infinite product variants preventing pre-design and standardization
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.
Affected Stakeholders
Engineers, Project Managers, Manufacturing Leads
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$200kβ$1M per year in excess engineering and compliance effort plus schedule delays, as repeated manual reviews and redesigns inflate project engineering cost by 20β40% and delay revenue recognition on large processing lines. β’ $300kβ$1.5M per year in excess engineering and compliance cost plus schedule slippage, as repeated manual compliance work adds 20β40% extra effort to engineered orders and pushes delivery dates, triggering liquidated damages risk and lost follow-on orders. β’ $500kβ$3M per year in avoidable engineering and customization cost across plants, driven by 20β40% excess engineering hours on ETO projects, plus hidden margin erosion from under-costed quotes and repeated rework that finance cannot see early enough to act on.
Current Workarounds
Cost accountants back-calculate engineering and customization costs per order using adβhoc spreadsheets, email threads, and engineer feedback instead of structured configuration and costing data. β’ The analyst manually reconstructs each custom configuration by cross-checking CAD printouts, PDFs, email threads, and ERP notes, then logs findings and cost attributions in personal Excel files and adβhoc SharePoint/Network folders. β’ They copy previous project documentation, adapt it manually in Word/Excel, and track open compliance issues in spreadsheets and email threads, relying on individual memory of past projects to judge whether a new configuration is 'close enough' to an approved one.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Request Deep Analysis
πΊπΈ Be first to access this market's intelligence