Lost, misrouted, or compromised send‑out specimens leading to redraws and repeat testing
Definition
When send‑out samples are not traceable at each handoff, they are more likely to be lost, misrouted, or exposed to out‑of‑range temperatures, forcing recollection and repeat testing. Sample tracking solution providers highlight that manual tracking leads to errors and that real‑time specimen tracking cuts down on mistakes, protects sample condition, and reduces rework.[1][4][5][6]
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $50–$200 per affected case (recollection visit, staff time, shipping and test repeat) and easily $100,000+ per year for large labs given frequent redraws and repeats on send‑outs reported in quality programs
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Lack of barcoded or RFID specimen IDs tied to each movement; missing temperature and time‑in‑transit monitoring; customs or courier interventions where blocks or tubes are removed and not replaced; no integrated audit trail for outsourced tests.[1][2][4][5]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Medical and Diagnostic Laboratories.
Affected Stakeholders
Quality managers, Laboratory technologists, Phlebotomy supervisors, Reference lab liaisons, Nursing units and outpatient clinic staff
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$50–$200 per affected biospecimen in redraw, shipping, and repeat testing, with easily $100,000+ per year in large research programs when frequent redraws and protocol deviations trigger extra monitoring visits, sponsor credits, or loss of future study awards. • $50–$200 per affected case in recollection, staff time, shipping, and repeat testing, plus tens of thousands of dollars annually in sales productivity loss and potential lost contracts when large employer accounts lose confidence in turnaround and chain of custody. • $50–$200 per affected specimen in recollection, repeat shipping, and retesting, plus additional costs tied to delayed public health reporting, contract penalties, or loss of preferred status with state or local health departments—often reaching six figures annually in high‑volume or outbreak periods.
Current Workarounds
Credentialing and account staff manually cross‑check shipment manifests, courier tracking numbers, and reference lab accession reports in spreadsheets and shared email folders whenever public health partners report missing or delayed specimens. • Credentialing and study support staff rely on email chains with sites and labs, shipment manifests in Excel, and scanned or faxed paper logs to reconstruct where a sample went when CROs report missing, late, or compromised specimens. • Manual tracking via phone calls, emails, or spreadsheets
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Lost charge capture for send‑out tests due to poor tracking and order/result mismatches
Excess courier, shipping, and labor costs from inefficient send‑out specimen tracking
Delayed billing and extended AR from slow send‑out status visibility
Technologist and coordinator time wasted searching for and reconciling send‑out specimens
Chain-of-custody and traceability deficiencies risking CLIA/ISO nonconformities for send‑outs
Opportunity for inappropriate test billing and misuse of send‑out workflows due to weak tracking controls
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence