Fraud and Abuse Schemes Including Upcoding and Billing for Worthless or Nonexistent Services
Definition
Beyond errors, some nursing homes engage in fraudulent billing to Medicare and Medicaid, such as upcoding, billing for services never provided, or providing grossly substandard care while billing as if services were properly delivered. These practices result in large settlements, treble damages under the False Claims Act, and reputational harm.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $Millions to tens of millions per case in settlements, damages, and legal fees; sector-wide exposure is substantial
- Frequency: Recurring at sector level; periodic but severe at the facility or chain level
- Root Cause: Incentives to maximize reimbursement combined with weak internal controls and oversight create opportunities for upcoding, misrepresentation of service levels, and billing for therapy or skilled services that do not meet coverage criteria. Legal and consumer protection resources document numerous prosecutions of larger nursing home chains for upcoding, worthless services, and billing for services never rendered.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.
Affected Stakeholders
Corporate executives and owners, Administrators, Compliance and legal departments, Billing and coding staff, Frontline clinical staff pressured to document certain services
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$1.5M-$6M annually per facility from upcoding, phantom services, and false staffing charges (search results show upcoding is endemic; PACS case involved billing for unnecessary therapies and fake staff hours) • $10M to $50M+ per case in settlements (Cornerstone $21.6M for unlicensed staff; Cigna $172M; Martin's Point $22.5M); potential criminal liability; CMS program exclusion; FY2024 Medicare FFS improper payments $31.70B sector-wide • $172M Cigna settlement for inaccurate diagnosis codes; $22.5M Martin's Point settlement; audit costs $500K-$2M per investigation
Current Workarounds
Administrator directs systematic upcoding of therapy services and acuity levels; manual overrides of care protocols; no cross-verification to actual services delivered • Billing manager submits inflated diagnosis codes and procedure codes for managed care members; manual Excel tracking hides patterns; no cross-reference to clinical documentation • Charts services that weren't provided; bills for therapy sessions not conducted; covers up use of uncertified staff by falsifying credential records manually
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Chronic Medicare Part A SNF Denials From PDPM Coding and Documentation Errors
Medicaid Revenue Loss From Unit, Census, and Eligibility Errors
Operational Cost Overruns from Rework on Denied and Audited Claims
Cost of Poor Quality Documentation Leading to Repayments and Revenue Loss
Extended Time-to-Cash from High Denial and Resubmission Rates
Billing and Clinical Staff Capacity Consumed by Documentation and Audit Burden
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence