Loss of Donor Tax-Deductibility and IRS Risk from Pass-Through Benevolence Gifts
Definition
When members earmark gifts to specific individuals and the church simply passes funds through, the IRS treats those as non‑deductible gifts from donor to individual, not charitable contributions, jeopardizing donor deductions and exposing the church to audit risk. Church tax advisors stress that benevolence funds must remain under full church control and not be donor‑directed to avoid IRS noncompliance.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $10,000–$100,000 per year in lost or reduced donations in mid‑sized churches once donors learn that designated pass‑through gifts are not deductible; potential additional cost in IRS penalties and professional fees during examinations.
- Frequency: Monthly
- Root Cause: Improperly allowing donors to designate benevolence gifts to named individuals, failure to maintain organizational control over distributions, and inadequate understanding of IRS rules distinguishing charitable assistance from private gifts and private inurement.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Religious Institutions.
Affected Stakeholders
Senior pastor, Executive pastor, Finance director, Church treasurer, Development/fundraising staff, Board members/elders
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$10,000-$100,000+ baseline loss in reduced donations once donors learn gifts are non-deductible; audit defense costs $8,000-$30,000; potential IRS penalties on church (501c3 status jeopardy for repeated violations) • $10,000-$100,000+ in lost donor deductions; bookkeeper liability exposure if audited (questions about competency/training); IRS penalties on church • $10,000-$60,000+ in lost external and internal donor deductions; governance liability if audit reveals board-approved pass-throughs; audit defense costs
Current Workarounds
Approval workflow lacks designated-gift detection; board minutes document approvals without noting donor intent restrictions; informal understanding that 'church will manage it' • Creates private Excel spreadsheet with 'restricted' column; communicates intent via email threads that bypass benevolence policy review; manual spreadsheet becomes source of truth instead of official ledger • Facilities manager manually documents earmarked requests via email threads, Excel tracking sheets, or personal notes; communicates intent informally to church leadership without standardized intake process; requests are sometimes fulfilled as direct pass-through payments to individuals rather than through formal benevolence fund controls
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Benevolence Funds Misused Due to Lack of Segregation of Duties and Oversight
Ad Hoc, Emotion-Driven Benevolence Decisions Leading to Misallocation of Limited Funds
Under-Documentation and Untracked Benevolence Disbursements Causing Hidden Revenue and Reporting Gaps
Manual, Paper-Based Benevolence Processes Increasing Administrative Cost per Case
Slow Approval and Disbursement of Benevolence Leaving Urgent Bills Unpaid
Pastoral and Staff Capacity Consumed by Casework and Rework in Benevolence Processing
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence