Internal AP fraud and vendor collusion enabled by poor segregation of duties
Definition
In many restaurants, the same person can create vendors, enter invoices, approve them, and execute payments, creating fertile ground for schemes like ghost vendors, inflated invoices, or collusion with suppliers. These frauds are often small and recurring, making them hard to detect without AP controls.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Common restaurant AP fraud schemes typically run $10,000–$100,000 before detection; on a risk‑adjusted basis, weak‑control restaurants can expect an implicit cost of several hundred to a few thousand dollars per location per year
- Frequency: Monthly (fraudulent payments are typically embedded in normal payment runs)
- Root Cause: Lack of segregation of duties and absence of centralized, logged payment workflows. Restaurant AP best‑practice sources highlight the need to ‘divide the duties’ and warn that consolidated controlled payment platforms are needed to ‘detect fraud and anomalies’ and ‘avoid unauthorized payments,’ implying that without these structures, fraud risk is material and recurring.[3][6]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Restaurants.
Affected Stakeholders
Accounts payable clerk, Bookkeeper, Controller, Owner (as ultimate victim)
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$10,000–$30,000 annually per location from markup schemes, phantom charges, or vendor kickbacks on corporate events • $15,000–$50,000 annually per location from inflated event costs, phantom vendor charges, or markup schemes on high-value private events • $2,000–$15,000 annually per location from duplicate catering invoices, inflated pricing on pickup orders, collusion with preferred vendors on pricing
Current Workarounds
Email approval chains, manual invoice tracking, personal vendor contact database, ad-hoc payment requests to Accounting • Excel spreadsheets, email chains, manual vendor list management, personal payment authorization • FoH Manager approves event vendor invoices via email or phone; no formal PO or three-way matching; payments made without confirmation of delivery
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Late fees and lost early‑payment discounts from ad‑hoc AP
Overpayments and duplicate payments to vendors
Paying above contracted prices and missing vendor credits
Costs from invoice errors and rework in AP
AP process ties up working capital and destabilizes cash flow
Manager and back‑office time consumed by manual AP instead of revenue‑driving work
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence