Incorrect MTM Billing Codes Leading to Zero Reimbursement
Definition
Pharmacies submit claims for additional MTM service time using CPT code 99607 with zero dollar amounts, resulting in no reimbursement despite compliance requirements to bill correctly. Claims are processed in 'pay' status but pharmacies receive $0, causing lost revenue on documented service units. This occurs systemically in state Medicaid programs requiring accurate coding for follow-up minutes.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: $34-$130 per unbilled unit (based on service level rates)
- Frequency: Per claim submission - recurring with each MTM service exceeding initial 15 minutes
- Root Cause: Mandatory submission of zero-dollar claims for add-on codes under Medicaid rules without corresponding reimbursement
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Retail Pharmacies.
Affected Stakeholders
billing specialists, pharmacists, pharmacy managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$2,000-$15,000 monthly (per location) in documented zero-reimbursement MTM codes + lost revenue from staff decisions to shorten visits to avoid 99607 = $24,000-$180,000 annually per pharmacy β’ $34-$130 per 99607 unit Γ average 4 units per patient per day Γ patient volume = $2,720-$10,400 monthly revenue loss per pharmacy location β’ $34-$130 per service unit unbilled + reputation risk if state audits find underbilled services or compliance violations = $50,000-$200,000 annually per location in potential audit liability
Current Workarounds
Excel spreadsheets and manual claim tracking to document 99607 units submitted at $0 reimbursement; paper-based reconciliation of 'compliant but unpaid' claims; WhatsApp coordination with pharmacy manager to confirm which units were billed vs. received payment β’ Informal time rounding (billing 15 min instead of 30-45 min to avoid 99607 submission); collaboration with billing team via casual conversation to determine which services 'actually get paid'; mental tracking of which patient visits to 'not fully bill' β’ Manual analysis of claim reports; coordination calls with billing team and state Medicaid to 'verify' that this is expected (i.e., confirms the leak is intentional/required); potential pressure on staff to reduce MTM visit lengths to avoid 99607; spreadsheet tracking of 'lost reimbursement' as separate line item in revenue reports
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Medicare Fraud Risk from Unbilled Parallel MTM Services
Denied MTM Claims Due to New vs Established Patient Coding Errors
Overcharging MTM Services Beyond State-Regulated Amounts
Failure to Receive 340B Ceiling Prices from Manufacturers
Diversion and Duplicate Discount Violations in Contract Pharmacies
HRSA Audit Failures and Required Repayments for Diversion/Duplicate Discounts
Request Deep Analysis
πΊπΈ Be first to access this market's intelligence