🇺🇸United States

Mispricing and misselection of payment methods due to underestimating risk and compliance costs

3 verified sources

Definition

Travel firms sometimes over‑adopt high‑risk payment products (e.g., BNPL for high‑value trips) or maintain high‑fee cards as default for B2B supplier payments, underestimating the true cost of fraud, chargebacks, and regulatory compliance. This leads to structurally higher cost‑to‑serve and misaligned product mixes.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Airline and broader travel payment systems already consume billions annually; commentary notes that BNPL and similar products require licenses and pose elevated risk, especially when not fully costed into decision‑making.[4][6][7]
  • Frequency: Monthly
  • Root Cause: Lack of integrated risk‑adjusted profitability analysis by payment method, siloed fraud and finance data, and strategic decisions on payment options made without a full view of downstream dispute, fraud, and compliance costs.[4][6][8]

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Travel Arrangements.

Affected Stakeholders

Head of Payments, Product Management (Payments/Checkout), Risk & Compliance, CFO, Commercial Strategy / Revenue Management

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$10,000-$40,000/month (2-3% chargeback fees, 5-10% compliance cost overhead, 20-30 hours/month in manual reconciliation at $50-$75/hour labor) • $10,000-$40,000/month (BNPL licensing and underwriting costs hidden; chargeback disputes on luxury items average 60-90 days; manual white-glove processing $1,000-$3,000/month) • $10,000-$40,000/month (chargebacks 2-3% of group bookings, manual refund tracking 25-35 hours/month, supplier refund delays creating liquidity issues)

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Each team or consultant informally decides the payment method per supplier or trip using habits and rough rules of thumb, then tracks exceptions, reserves, and disputes in ad‑hoc spreadsheets, email threads, and notes because there is no centralized costing and risk engine for payment routing. • Excel spreadsheets to manually track payment method costs, fraud losses, and holdback reserves; email negotiations with acquirers over reserve amounts • Manual BNPL transaction audit spreadsheet; email alerts to Supplier Relations; phone calls to BNPL provider; paper-based compliance tracking

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Margin erosion from FX spreads, bank fees, and high-cost payment rails on supplier remittances

For airlines alone, payment transactions cost $20.3B annually (2.2% of transaction value, ~78% of net profits), implying multi‑billion‑dollar leakage across the wider travel sector from payment costs and fees every year.[4]

Unrecovered costs from late customer payments versus fixed‑date supplier remittances

Average time to receive payment after invoice due date is 40.3 days; almost 40% of travel businesses report most invoice payments arriving outside specified terms, indicating systematic working‑capital leakage at scale.[1]

Labor cost overruns from manual supplier payment processing and reconciliation

60% of large travel firms lose more than 1.5 hours per employee per week to manual payment processing; at scale this translates into significant additional FTE cost that could otherwise be avoided.[3]

Excess processing costs from inefficient, complex payment ecosystems

Airline payment transactions alone cost $20.3B annually (2.2% of transaction value); broader travel merchants report payment system complexity as a major issue impacting profitability.[4]

Payment errors causing supplier disputes, rework, and service disruption

Manual reconciliations and errors for operators running multiple tours each season can “snowball into major delays and lost productivity,” indicating recurring operational and service‑recovery costs, even if not always quantified as direct refunds.[2][3]

Extended days sales outstanding (DSO) due to late payments and slow settlement cycles

Average time to receive payments after invoice due date is 40.3 days, and nearly 40% of travel businesses report most invoices are paid outside specified terms, implying chronic working‑capital drag.[1]

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence