🇺🇸United States

Operational bottlenecks at shipping/receiving from manual manifest handling

2 verified sources

Definition

Loading bays and receiving areas at TSDFs and large generators lose capacity as drivers and staff wait for manifests to be filled out, checked, and corrected. Documentation steps at the gate or scale house can extend truck turn‑times and reduce the number of loads processed per shift.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: $5,000–$30,000+ per month per busy facility in lost throughput and labor inefficiency; larger TSDFs can see higher impacts during peak periods
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Paper manifests require handwritten completion and review of multiple data points (EPA IDs, waste codes, quantities, facility information, signatures) before waste can be accepted or released.[1][3] Any missing or inconsistent data forces on‑the‑spot corrections, calls to generators, or even load refusals, tying up loading docks and personnel who must focus on documentation rather than processing waste.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Waste Treatment and Disposal.

Affected Stakeholders

TSDF receiving and scale house operators, Transport drivers, Yard and dock supervisors, Scheduling/dispatch coordinators

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1,000–$5,000/month in safety audit remediation; potential fine exposure ($10K–$50K+) if safety incident linked to gate congestion • $10,000–$30,000/month for large generators sending 10+ loads/week; each 30-min delay = $300-500 in driver/truck idle time • $10,000–$40,000+ per month during active remediation campaigns due to reduced truck turns, overtime for document reconciliation, and missed opportunity to accept more loads per shift.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Facility managers juggle paper manifests, email PDFs, and last-minute phone approvals from project managers, then manually key data into spreadsheets or legacy systems after the truck is released. • Finance controller extracts manual data from paper manifests, binders, scale logs; uses Excel to reconcile cost-per-load; cannot attribute delays to specific process steps • Gate staff and facility supervisors rely on pre-printed multi-part paper manifests, handwritten corrections, clipboards and binders, ad-hoc Excel logs, and phone/email back-and-forth with contractors to fix missing or incorrect details instead of a fully integrated e-Manifest workflow.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence