🇦🇪UAE

غياب التحقق من الدفع والاحتيال في الكمية (Payment Verification & Quantity Fraud in Credit Lines)

2 verified sources

Definition

Contractor credit lines operated without automated three-way matching: PO → Delivery Verification → Invoice. Contractors receive goods, delay payment, then dispute invoice claiming shipment quantity was short or quality poor. Supplier has no dated photographic evidence, contractor signature, or real-time receipt confirmation. Payment dispute escalates into legal threat or bad debt write-off.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: AED 500K-1.5M annually per AED 50M contractor receivables (2-4% disputed/unrecoverable amounts); 30-60 days additional cash delay per dispute; Legal costs: AED 50-100K per disputed contract
  • Frequency: 5-15% of invoices disputed; Occurs monthly
  • Root Cause: Manual invoice creation without linked delivery proof; absence of contractor digital sign-off/acceptance process; no automated dispute escalation; missing photographic documentation of shipments; decentralized data (invoices in AR, delivery notes in logistics, POs in procurement)

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Wholesale Building Materials.

Affected Stakeholders

AR Manager, Logistics Manager, Sales Executive, Legal/Collections

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

تأخير التحصيل من المقاولين (Delayed Contractor Payment Collection)

AED 2-5M annually per AED 50M in contractor receivables (4-10% of AR value); 20-35 days additional DSO per contract

عدم الامتثال لمعايير إدارة المخاطر الائتمانية (CBUAE CRMS Non-Compliance Penalties)

Compliance remediation: AED 500K-1.5M (system build, policy documentation, training); Regulatory penalties: AED 250K-5M (if violations found); Forced loan loss provisioning: AED 500K-2M (if NPL classification errors discovered)

خسارة العقود بسبب بطء عملية الموافقة الائتمانية (Contract Loss Due to Slow Credit Approval)

AED 2-5M annually (5-10% of contractor order volume lost to competitor); Lost margin: AED 400K-1M per year

تأخير تحرير الأموال بسبب معالجة وثائق التنازل عن الرهن اليدوي

AED 50,000-150,000 annually per supplier (estimated on 2-5% of turnover held in AR for 15-30 additional days; typical supplier turning AED 3-5M annually at 12% cost of capital)

خسارة الطاقة الإنتاجية بسبب الاختناقات اليدوية في إنشاء إشعارات التنازل الأولية

AED 150,000-280,000 annually (80-160 hours/month × 12 months × AED 150-200/hour loaded labor cost)

غرامات وفقدان المطالبة بسبب الأخطاء في صيغة التنازل أو عدم الامتثال للمتطلبات

AED 30,000-150,000 annually per supplier (2-8% of disputed receivables; loss of lien protection exposure + legal defense costs estimated at AED 15,000-50,000 per major dispute)

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence