AS1428.1 Non-Compliance Costs
Definition
Manufacturers face costs from producing non-compliant door hardware if usability testing fails to meet AS1428.1 force, grip, and operability requirements, leading to rework, retrofits, and legal liabilities under DDA.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 5,000-20,000 per project in rework and retrofitting costs
- Frequency: Per non-compliant product batch or building project
- Root Cause: Manual or insufficient usability testing with disabled user groups failing to validate compliance
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Accessible Hardware players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 10,000+ per non-compliant project on rework and liability. Automation of usability testing eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Manufacturing Managers, Product Designers, Quality Assurance Teams
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
R&D Investment Overruns
DDA Liability Exposure
DDA Accessibility Non-Compliance Fines
WCAG Certification Rework Costs
Lost Sales from Accessibility Churn
Cost of Poor Quality in Compatibility Testing
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence