🇦🇺Australia

Weak Three-Way Matching and Duplicate Payment Risk

3 verified sources

Definition

Without robust automated three-way matching, invoices matching PO quantities/prices, goods receipt notes, and supplier invoices are manually verified or missed entirely. This creates exposure to duplicate payments, unauthorized billing, and fraud.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: LOGIC-based estimate: Duplicate or fraudulent payments typically represent 0.5–2% of annual AP spend; rework and dispute resolution costs 10–30 hours/month.
  • Frequency: Per invoice; detected during reconciliation (monthly or quarterly)
  • Root Cause: Manual invoice matching processes, lack of automated three-way match rules, missing or incorrect goods receipt data, inadequate vendor controls and segregation of duties

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian businesses lose 0.5–2% of AP spend to duplicate payments, unauthorized invoices, and billing errors. Automated three-way matching eliminates manual errors and fraud exposure.

Affected Stakeholders

AP Clerk, AP Manager, Receiving Officer, Finance Director, Internal Audit

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence