Cost Overrun from EVMS Non-Compliance
Definition
Australian Defence requires tailored EVM implementation for medium/high-risk contracts to trace cost/schedule impacts, with project managers responsible for assurance; failures result in unmitigated overruns[1][2].
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 1m+ overruns per $20m+ contract (industry standard 5-10% variance loss)
- Frequency: Per qualifying contract (>AUD 20m)
- Root Cause: Lack of validated EVMS leading to poor visibility on work package variances
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Defence contractors in Australia waste 5-10% of project budgets on overruns due to poor EVMS reporting. Automation of EVMS compliance eliminates undetected losses.
Affected Stakeholders
Project Managers, Contractors, CASG Officers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Decision Errors from Delayed EVMS Data
EVMS Assurance Failures
Procurement Delays and Cost Escalations
Idle Capacity from Compliance Bottlenecks
Export Control Permit Breaches
Compliance Ambiguities & Red Tape
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence