🇦🇺Australia

Vergabeverstöße und Prüfungsfeststellungen bei öffentlichen Eventaufträgen

2 verified sources

Definition

The ANAO performance audit of Tourism Australia’s procurement and contract management evaluates whether procurement and contracting complied with the PGPA Act, rules and the Commonwealth Procurement Rules.[6] Where procurement and contract management is found non‑compliant (e.g. poor documentation, inadequate value‑for‑money assessment, misused procurement method), entities can face adverse audit findings, be required to terminate or re‑tender contracts, and implement corrective action plans. Logic: for event suppliers, such findings can lead to early termination or exclusion from future panels; for the buying agency, they incur internal re‑work, potential investigations and legal review.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified (Logic): Loss of a single mid‑size government event management contract of AUD 250,000–500,000 due to non‑compliant procurement; plus 100–200 internal hours (≈AUD 10,000–30,000 labour cost) for re‑running the procurement and responding to audit findings.
  • Frequency: Infrequent but high‑impact; typically identified during periodic ANAO or internal audits or after complaints from unsuccessful tenderers.
  • Root Cause: Incomplete procurement plans, missing evaluation documentation, inconsistent application of CPR thresholds, and weak contract record‑keeping by agencies and event suppliers.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Event services providers in Australia 🇦🇺 risk losing contracts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars when procurement and contract records do not meet ANAO and Finance expectations. Automating compliance checks, documentation and approval workflows in vendor procurement and contract management protects these revenues.

Affected Stakeholders

Government Procurement Officer, Event Agency Account Director, Compliance Manager, Chief Financial Officer, Contract Manager

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

2-5% revenue loss from cart abandonment (industry standard for manual/poor UX registration)

Superannuation Guarantee Shortfalls from Payment Delays

20% SG Charge on unpaid super (e.g., AUD 230 charge on AUD 1,000 shortfall per employee/month)

Delayed GST/BAS Lodgement Penalties

AUD 222 per late BAS lodgement (minimum penalty); up to AUD 1,110 for repeated failures

Verzögerte Meilenstein-Zahlungen durch manuelle Rechnungsstellung

Quantified: 15–30 extra DSO days on 30–40% of revenue, tying up ~A$500k–A$1.5m working capital for a A$5–10m agency → A$25,000–A$150,000 p.a. financing/opportunity cost; plus ~10–20 hours/month of manual reconciliation and chasing payments.

Nicht abgerechnete Zusatzleistungen und Mehraufwände bei Events

Quantified: 2–5% revenue leakage from unbilled extras and scope creep → A$100,000–A$250,000 p.a. on A$5m revenue; plus additional write-offs after client disputes.

Überhöhte Zahlungsgebühren und vermeidbare Transaktionskosten

Quantified: A$2.50 per ticket on low-priced tickets and 5–7% fees on high-value tickets, fully or partially absorbed by the organiser → A$80,000–A$120,000 p.a. for ~40,000 tickets; optimisation can save A$30,000–A$60,000 p.a.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence