Bad Vendor Selection Costs
Definition
In vendor selection, failure to properly assess TCO, compliance, scalability, and fit results in excessive costs from licensing, training, support, and rework. Government guidelines emphasize structured processes to avoid these risks.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ per project in excess TCO (licensing, deployment, ongoing support); 20-40% higher costs from unfit vendors
- Frequency: Per procurement cycle (1-4 times/year)
- Root Cause: Lack of structured criteria-based evaluation, ignoring TCO and compliance checkpoints
Why This Matters
The Pitch: IT System Design Services firms in Australia π¦πΊ waste AUD 50,000+ annually on poor vendor choices. Automation of vendor evaluation eliminates decision errors.
Affected Stakeholders
Procurement Managers, IT Directors, CFOs
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Procurement Process Overruns
ATO BAS Lodgement Penalties
Fair Work Record-Keeping Fines
Rework from Poor Solution Design Documentation
Delayed Invoicing from Design Documentation Gaps
Unbezahlte Change Requests durch fehlende schriftliche NachtrΓ€ge
Request Deep Analysis
π¦πΊ Be first to access this market's intelligence