Blast Delay from Monitoring Bottlenecks
Definition
Exceedances require 48-hour reporting, blast redesign (e.g., reduce MIC), and register maintenance, idling equipment.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 20,000 - 100,000 per day in lost production from blast halts
- Frequency: Per exceedance event
- Root Cause: Reactive manual monitoring causing post-blast discoveries and redesign loops
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Quarries in Australia 🇦🇺 lose 1-2 production shifts (AUD 50,000+) per exceedance due to blast redesign. Automated monitoring prevents downtime.
Affected Stakeholders
Operations Manager, Blast Designer
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Blasting Vibration Exceedance Fines
Vibration Monitoring Labour Overheads
Cost of Poor Quality in Aggregate Testing
Capacity Loss from Manual Aggregate Testing
Compliance Penalties for Aggregate Non-Conformance
Extended Payment Terms & Working Capital Drag
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence