Cost of Poor Quality in Aggregate Testing
Definition
Failure to meet aggregate quality standards like gradation and specific gravity results in material rejection, requiring rework, additional testing, and project delays in construction applications.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 20,000-100,000 per major non-conformance incident (re-testing, rework, delay claims); 5-10% project cost overrun from quality failures
- Frequency: Per batch or quarterly conformance testing
- Root Cause: Manual testing variability in gradation/specific gravity assessments leading to non-compliance with AS 2758
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Nonmetallic mineral mining players in Australia waste AUD 50,000+ per rejected batch on rework and delays. Automation of quality testing eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Quarry Managers, QA/QC Technicians, Project Engineers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Capacity Loss from Manual Aggregate Testing
Compliance Penalties for Aggregate Non-Conformance
Blasting Vibration Exceedance Fines
Vibration Monitoring Labour Overheads
Blast Delay from Monitoring Bottlenecks
Extended Payment Terms & Working Capital Drag
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence