Non-compliant Substrate Specification Fines
Definition
Inaccurate manual specification of substrates like PET, PP or PLA during cost estimation can result in materials failing FSANZ chemical migration tests, causing batch rejection and disposal costs.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 10,000+ per non-compliant batch (material + rework)
- Frequency: Per production run
- Root Cause: Manual errors in matching substrate barrier properties and certifications to regulatory limits
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Packaging and Containers players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 10,000+ per batch on rework from manual substrate errors. Automation of material specification eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Process Engineers, Cost Estimators, Quality Managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Compostable Certification Failure Penalties
ISPM 15 Timber Substrate Non-Compliance
Cost of Poor Quality
Capacity Loss
Cost Overrun
Produktivitäts- und Kapazitätsverlust durch manuelles Artwork-Versionieren
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence