Fehlende Kostendeckung im Brief- und Frankiergeschäft

Definition

Australia Post’s letter business is consistently loss‑making despite record group revenues. In FY22, letters generated a loss of AUD 255.7m within a group profit before tax of AUD 55.3m, with falling volumes and a growing delivery network.[2] In FY25, the corporation reported a group pre‑tax profit of AUD 18.8m but a specific loss of AUD 230.4m in its letter service, driven by continued volume decline and high fixed costs.[1] Industry coverage reports Australia Post losing about AUD 1m per day on letters during certain periods, reflecting under‑recovery of costs in the letters network.[3] Since most transactional mail from businesses and government is still priced on broadly uniform tariffs, there is a revenue‑leakage effect where the full handling, sorting, and last‑mile costs for low‑margin letters are not recouped. From a forensic view, this is a measurable revenue shortfall linked directly to the way postage is priced, metered, and collected. Assuming annual letter‑segment losses in the AUD 230–260m range and that inefficient metering, billing structures, and product design account conservatively for 10–20% of this gap (the rest being unavoidable universal‑service cost), this implies an avoidable revenue leakage band of roughly AUD 23–52m per year in Australia attributable to misaligned tariffs, lack of granular metering‑based pricing, and insufficient recovery of surcharges for complex handling.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Postal services players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste rund AUD 230–260 Mio. pro Jahr in unterdeckten Brief- und Frankierleistungen. Automation of cost-based pricing, metering data analytics, and product mix optimization in revenue collection can reduce this structural loss by a measurable percentage.

Affected Stakeholders

CFO / Leiter Finanzen, Leiter Brief- und Produktmanagement, Leiter Vertrieb Geschäftskunden, Leiter Revenue Assurance, Leiter Controlling

Related Business Risks