Unfair Gaps๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ Australia

Regenerative Design Business Guide

28Documented Cases
Evidence-Backed

Get Solutions, Not Just Problems

We documented 28 challenges in Regenerative Design. Now get the actionable solutions โ€” vendor recommendations, process fixes, and cost-saving strategies that actually work.

We'll create a custom report for your industry within 48 hours

All 28 cases with evidence
Actionable solutions
Delivered in 24-48h
Want Solutions NOW?

Skip the wait โ€” get instant access

  • All 28 documented pains
  • Business solutions for each pain
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Reportโ€” $39

All 28 Documented Cases

Stakeholder Engagement Cost Overruns

40-80 hours/month per project at AUD 150/hour consultant rate = AUD 6,000-12,000/month

Regenerative projects require ongoing community involvement, surveys, and workshops, leading to unbudgeted labor and delays in facility management transitions.

VerifiedDetails

Capacity Loss from POE Performance Gaps

10-20% annual capacity value loss per building (e.g., AUD 100,000+ for mid-size project) from performance gaps[1][4][5]

Without rigorous POE, buildings underperform against design specs, resulting in inefficient space use and elevated running costs that erode asset capacity.

VerifiedDetails

Verification Non-Compliance and Credit Issuance Failure

Estimated AUD $10,000โ€“$50,000 per project delay (lost revenue from 4โ€“8 week verification cycle; typical ACCU projects worth AUD $50kโ€“$500k annually). Recurring: 15โ€“30% of submissions face initial findings requiring rework[2].

Projects must meet strict eligibility criteria: be new, go beyond business-as-usual, not be required by law, not receive specified government support, and follow approved methods[8]. VVBs conduct desk reviews, site visits, technical reviews, and scheme approvals before credit issuance[2]. Each rejection loop adds 4-8 weeks of rework. No credits = no revenue until resubmission is approved.

VerifiedDetails

Verification Rejection and Project De-Registration

Estimated AUD $3,000โ€“$10,000 sunk cost per failed project (measurement, reporting, third-party consultancy, VVB gap analysis). For portfolios: 5โ€“10% rejection rate ร— average AUD $5k cost = AUD $2.5kโ€“$5k per 10 projects.

VVBs issue findings for non-conformities. If findings cannot be closed before scheme approval, verification fails[2]. Per ACCU Scheme rules, projects must be new, beyond business-as-usual, not legally required, not subsidized by specified government programs, and not excluded activities[8]. Failure on *any* criterion results in permanent ineligibility.

VerifiedDetails