Benzinverlust durch Undichtigkeiten und Messungenauigkeiten
Definition
Automatic tank gauging (ATG) is described by Australian suppliers as a critical component for managing fuel storage tanks, providing precise fuel level measurements, loss prevention analysis and inventory reconciliation.[4][6]Manual dipping and spreadsheet-based reconciliation are still common in smaller sites, which increases the risk that small leaks, theft or calibration/temperature errors remain undetected. Industry ATG solutions (e.g. Gilbarco TLS4, Liquip/OPW systems) are specifically marketed to "reduce fuel variances" and provide precision inventory reconciliation and loss prevention analysis, indicating that such variances are a known and material problem in the market.[4][6]In practice, even a 0,5 % unexplained loss on a typical retail site selling 4 M L/year at a gross margin of ~AUD 0.10/L equates to around AUD 20 000 of margin leakage per site annually. Across a network of 10–20 sites this can quickly reach AUD 200 000–400 000 per year. Automated tank monitoring with continuous statistical leak detection and calibrated tank charts can reduce unexplained variance to closer to 0,1 %, leaving only ~AUD 4 000 equivalent loss on the same volume, i.e. avoiding ~AUD 16 000 per site per year. These amounts are not directly invoiced or recovered and therefore represent pure revenue leakage.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Logikschätzung: 0,3–0,7 % unerklärte Bestandsverluste ohne ATG; bei 4 Mio. L/Jahr und 0,10 AUD Marge/L ca. 12 000–28 000 AUD Rohertragsverlust pro Standort und Jahr; ATG reduziert dies typischerweise auf <0,1 % (~4 000 AUD Verlust), also vermeidbare Leckage von etwa 8 000–24 000 AUD/Jahr/Standort.
- Frequency: Laufend, täglich; kleine Differenzen akkumulieren sich über das gesamte Jahr.
- Root Cause: Manuelle Peilung der Tanks, ungenaue Tankkalibrierung, fehlende kontinuierliche Lecküberwachung, fehlende integrierte Bestandsabstimmung zwischen Lieferungen, Pumpenabgaben und Tankinhalten.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Retail gasoline players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste schätzungsweise 0,3–0,7 % ihres jährlichen Kraftstoffumsatzes durch unerkannte Verluste und Messfehler im Tankbestandsmanagement. Automatisierte, regelkonforme Tanküberwachung und Bestellabwicklung reduziert diese Verluste auf unter 0,1 % und schützt Margen.
Affected Stakeholders
Tankstellenbetreiber, Retail Fuel Site Manager, CFO/Finance Manager von Tankstellennetzen, Umwelt- und Compliance-Beauftragte
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Notfallbestellungen und Überbestände durch ungenaue Tankdisposition
Umsatzverlust durch Kraftstoffengpässe und Leerlauf an der Zapfsäule
Bußgelder wegen Verstoß gegen Jugendschutz und Alkohollizenzauflagen
Missbrauch durch unzureichende Altersprüfung bei Online‑Bestellungen und Lieferung
Cash Handling Cost Overrun
Cash Theft and Reconciliation Errors
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence