🇦🇺Australia

Benzinverlust durch Undichtigkeiten und Messungenauigkeiten

3 verified sources

Definition

Automatic tank gauging (ATG) is described by Australian suppliers as a critical component for managing fuel storage tanks, providing precise fuel level measurements, loss prevention analysis and inventory reconciliation.[4][6]Manual dipping and spreadsheet-based reconciliation are still common in smaller sites, which increases the risk that small leaks, theft or calibration/temperature errors remain undetected. Industry ATG solutions (e.g. Gilbarco TLS4, Liquip/OPW systems) are specifically marketed to "reduce fuel variances" and provide precision inventory reconciliation and loss prevention analysis, indicating that such variances are a known and material problem in the market.[4][6]In practice, even a 0,5 % unexplained loss on a typical retail site selling 4 M L/year at a gross margin of ~AUD 0.10/L equates to around AUD 20 000 of margin leakage per site annually. Across a network of 10–20 sites this can quickly reach AUD 200 000–400 000 per year. Automated tank monitoring with continuous statistical leak detection and calibrated tank charts can reduce unexplained variance to closer to 0,1 %, leaving only ~AUD 4 000 equivalent loss on the same volume, i.e. avoiding ~AUD 16 000 per site per year. These amounts are not directly invoiced or recovered and therefore represent pure revenue leakage.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Logikschätzung: 0,3–0,7 % unerklärte Bestandsverluste ohne ATG; bei 4 Mio. L/Jahr und 0,10 AUD Marge/L ca. 12 000–28 000 AUD Rohertragsverlust pro Standort und Jahr; ATG reduziert dies typischerweise auf <0,1 % (~4 000 AUD Verlust), also vermeidbare Leckage von etwa 8 000–24 000 AUD/Jahr/Standort.
  • Frequency: Laufend, täglich; kleine Differenzen akkumulieren sich über das gesamte Jahr.
  • Root Cause: Manuelle Peilung der Tanks, ungenaue Tankkalibrierung, fehlende kontinuierliche Lecküberwachung, fehlende integrierte Bestandsabstimmung zwischen Lieferungen, Pumpenabgaben und Tankinhalten.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Retail gasoline players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste schätzungsweise 0,3–0,7 % ihres jährlichen Kraftstoffumsatzes durch unerkannte Verluste und Messfehler im Tankbestandsmanagement. Automatisierte, regelkonforme Tanküberwachung und Bestellabwicklung reduziert diese Verluste auf unter 0,1 % und schützt Margen.

Affected Stakeholders

Tankstellenbetreiber, Retail Fuel Site Manager, CFO/Finance Manager von Tankstellennetzen, Umwelt- und Compliance-Beauftragte

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Notfallbestellungen und Überbestände durch ungenaue Tankdisposition

Logikschätzung: Zusätzliche Transportkosten für suboptimal geplante oder Notfalllieferungen ca. 5 000–15 000 AUD/Jahr/Standort plus 1 400–2 900 AUD/Jahr Opportunitätskosten durch überhöhte Sicherheitsbestände; insgesamt 6 400–17 900 AUD pro Standort und Jahr.

Umsatzverlust durch Kraftstoffengpässe und Leerlauf an der Zapfsäule

Logikschätzung: Pro vollem Produkt-Dry-Out-Tag etwa 2 000–3 000 AUD entgangene Marge; bei 2–3 relevanten Ereignissen/Jahr ca. 4 000–9 000 AUD pro Standort; auch mehrere kürzere Engpässe können sich auf 1 000–3 000 AUD/Jahr summieren.

Bußgelder wegen Verstoß gegen Jugendschutz und Alkohollizenzauflagen

Quantified (logic-based): AUD 1,000–AUD 10,000 statutory fine per detected under‑age sale incident, plus AUD 5,000–AUD 30,000 lost gross profit for a 3–14 day liquor‑licence suspension at a busy fuel‑convenience site; cumulative risk of AUD 10,000–AUD 40,000 per site per year when factoring detection probability and repeat‑offence escalation.

Missbrauch durch unzureichende Altersprüfung bei Online‑Bestellungen und Lieferung

Quantified (logic-based): For a site doing 20 online/delivery alcohol orders per day (~7,300 per year), if 1% lead to disputes or compliance issues due to poor age verification (73 orders) with an average loss of AUD 70 per order in refunds, chargebacks, and admin time, the direct annual loss is ~AUD 5,100. Adding the expected value of at least one regulatory penalty event every 2–3 years at AUD 5,000–AUD 10,000 pushes the effective annualised risk to ~AUD 5,000–AUD 20,000 per site.

Cash Handling Cost Overrun

AUD $14.2-28.4 million annual ongoing cash handling costs industry-wide; AUD $5.8 million one-off for fuel retailers installing terminals

Cash Theft and Reconciliation Errors

1-3% of cash transaction revenue lost to theft/shrinkage (industry standard); e.g., AUD 10,000-30,000/month per high-volume site

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence