STP Phase 2 Non-Compliance from Inaccurate Payroll Data
Definition
Mandatory STP Phase 2 requires real-time accurate employee payments data; unverified timesheets lead to BAS/STP lodgement failures.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 222 per failure + 20% shortfall interest; AUD 5,000+ for repeat failures
- Frequency: Quarterly BAS lodgements
- Root Cause: Manual attendance lacks audit-proof GPS verification
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Security guards firms in Australia 🇦🇺 face AUD 222+ per incorrect STP report. GPS-verified attendance ensures accurate payroll data.
Affected Stakeholders
Payroll Officers, Compliance Managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Excessive Overtime from Unverified Attendance
Fraudulent Timesheet Claims
Delayed Client Invoicing from Missing Proof
Vicarious Liability Claims
Bank Reconciliation Non-Compliance Fines
Nicht abgerechnete „Ghosting“-Leistungen im Objektschutz
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence