Verlust von Retail-Accounts durch unzuverlässige EDI- und PO-Abwicklung

Definition

A B2B sporting goods brand (Storelli Sports) reports that its initial 3PL partner struggled to handle complex, high-volume B2B orders that had demanding routing and EDI guidelines, which "subjected us to costly chargebacks" and "put us at risk" because 75% of its business depended on B2B channels with major retailers.[2] The brand explicitly notes that unreliable EDI and routing compliance strained retail partnerships and could have jeopardised critical accounts.[2] Shopify’s guide for B2B sporting goods stresses that seamless integration with retailer systems via EDI or APIs is "table stakes"; failure to do so risks delays, fulfillment errors or losing the account entirely.[4] SPS Commerce promotes its EDI services for groups like Super Retail Group in Australia precisely to ensure suppliers are compliant, have accurate product representation and get POS data to find growth, implying a competitive disadvantage and potential account loss for non‑compliant suppliers.[6][8] For an Australian sporting goods manufacturer, losing a single large retail account (e.g. a chain contributing 15–30% of domestic revenue) due to EDI non‑compliance or repeated PO/ASN failures can mean an abrupt revenue drop in the high six-figure to low seven-figure AUD range. Even before total delisting, retailers may shift volume to better-performing suppliers, translating into gradual revenue leakage through reduced order volumes.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Sportartikelhersteller riskieren in Australien 🇦🇺 den kompletten Verlust großer Retail-Konten, wenn EDI- und PO-Prozesse nicht skalieren. Eine robuste, automatisierte EDI- und Auftragsabwicklung schützt Millionenumsätze, indem sie stabile Service-Level gegenüber anspruchsvollen Ketten sicherstellt.

Affected Stakeholders

Geschäftsführung / Managing Director ANZ, Vertriebsleitung, Key-Account-Manager für Großkunden, Supply-Chain-Management, IT-/Digital-Verantwortliche

Related Business Risks