🇧🇷Brazil

Falhas de Qualidade por Componentes Contrafeitos em Defesa e Aeroespacial

4 verified sources

Definition

U.S. Department of Defense found over 1 million counterfeit components in military supply chain.[1] Even a single counterfeit part can compromise an entire system. Brazil lacks centralized IP rights database at customs and has no standard seizure procedures across states, creating vulnerability windows.[5] Defense contractors must manually verify supplier authenticity and test components (X-ray, electrical, visual).[4] Delays in detection lead to thousands of potentially faulty parts being detected and replaced post-delivery.[1]

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Estimated USD $5 billion annually in electronic failures traced to counterfeits globally[4]; Brazil-specific: Estimated 15-25% of rework costs in defense manufacturing (R$ 200,000–500,000 per significant counterfeit batch discovery based on typical defense component volumes).
  • Frequency: Ongoing; detected during production testing or post-delivery field failures.
  • Root Cause: Fragmented Brazilian customs procedures; no centralized IP database; manual supplier vetting bottlenecks; inadequate testing protocols before inventory placement.

Why This Matters

Pitch: Brazilian defense contractors waste millions annually on rework and quality failures caused by counterfeit electronic components. Automated supplier vetting, real-time supply chain authentication, and integration with Brazilian customs databases (COANA) eliminate detection delays and reduce counterfeit infiltration.

Affected Stakeholders

Supply Chain Manager, Quality Assurance Engineer, Procurement Specialist, Production Manager

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Multas e Penalidades por Não-Conformidade com DFARS/CAS e Regulações Aduaneiras Brasileiras

DFARS non-compliance: Potential contract suspension/loss (R$ 5,000,000–50,000,000+ for major defense contracts); Cost recovery denial for supplier-detected faults; Estimated audit remediation costs: R$ 50,000–200,000 per enforcement action.

Multas por Não Conformidade com Normas de Contabilidade de Custos em Contratos de Defesa

R$1-5 milhões em custos rejeitados ou recuperados por contrato; 20-50 horas/mês em auditorias DCAA

Sobrecustos por Alocação Incorreta de Custos (CAS Violations)

2-5% do valor do contrato em custos aumentados agregados; R$500k+ em impactos de CAP changes

Sobrecusto por Falhas no Controle de Mudanças

R$ 5-10M overrun per major project (typical for defense programs with multi-phase changes)

Perda de Capacidade por Atrasos em Revisões

20-40 hours/month per team in delays; 20-30% capacity loss per phase

Erros de Decisão por Falta de Visibilidade em Configurações

R$ 2-5M per program in misaligned investments (pré-investimento costs)

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence