🇧🇷Brazil

Responsabilidade Corporativa e Passivos por Desastres Ambientais

1 verified sources

Definition

London court ruling places direct liability on BHP for Fundão dam operation decisions despite 50-50 joint venture with Vale. Court found BHP had decision-making authority regarding dam operations and held it responsible for the disaster.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: £36 billion (approximately R$233 billion) liability ruling against BHP; affects 600,000+ people
  • Frequency: Single documented case; significant precedent for joint venture liability in Brazilian environmental disasters
  • Root Cause: Inadequate corporate governance; insufficient dam safety decision-making by parent companies; joint venture structure used to diffuse accountability

Why This Matters

The Pitch: BHP faces £36 billion liability in UK court for Brazil's Fundão dam collapse affecting 600,000+ people. Courts are piercing corporate veils on joint ventures, placing financial liability directly on parent companies for inadequate dam safety decision-making.

Affected Stakeholders

Corporate Board, Joint Venture Governance, Risk Management, Environmental Compliance

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence