🇧🇷Brazil

Ociosidade de Profissionais por Equipamento em Manutenção Não Planejada

3 verified sources

Definition

Source [1] explicitly warns: 'a falta desse zelo pode diminuir a durabilidade do equipamento, além de deixar os profissionais ociosos. Os prejuízos podem ser enormes, principalmente em relação ao cumprimento de prazos' (lack of care can leave professionals idle with enormous losses, especially regarding deadline compliance). Unplanned equipment failure halts entire field teams. No automated maintenance trigger leads to reactive, unscheduled service calls with 5–10 day turnaround, blocking field work and client deliverables.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Per instrument per year: 80–200 idle field hours × R$ 150–R$ 300/hour (fully-loaded field engineer cost) = R$ 12,000–R$ 60,000 annual capacity loss. Multiplied across typical 15–30 instruments per mid-sized firm = R$ 180,000–R$ 1,800,000 annual enterprise loss.
  • Frequency: Estimated 2–4 unplanned maintenance events per instrument per year, each causing 20–50 hours of field team idle time
  • Root Cause: Reactive vs. preventive maintenance scheduling; manual logs not linked to project calendars; no spare equipment inventory; third-party service provider dependencies without SLAs

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian surveying firms lose an estimated 80–200 billable field hours annually per instrument due to unplanned maintenance downtime. Predictive maintenance scheduling and spare equipment protocols eliminate idle time.

Affected Stakeholders

Field Survey Technicians, Project Schedulers, Equipment Operations Managers, Finance/Billing (lost billable hours)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Falha de Calibração e Retrabalho de Projetos Topográficos

Per incident: R$ 15,000–R$ 45,000 (rework labor + material + client compensation). Frequency: 2–5 incidents/year for firms managing 10+ precision instruments without automated tracking.

Perda de Garantia e Penalidades por Falta de Rastreamento de Manutenção

Per denial: R$ 8,000–R$ 25,000 (average precision topography instrument repair cost if out of warranty). Estimated 1–3 warranty claims rejected annually per firm due to documentation gaps.

Decisões Erradas de Substituição vs. Reparo por Falta de Dados de Manutenção

Per instrument: R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 unnecessary replacement or continued high-maintenance costs annually. Typical mid-sized firm with 20 instruments = R$ 100,000–R$ 300,000 annual total misallocation.

Perda de Receita por Cobrança Imprecisa de Área e Complexidade

R$5-R$20 por m² sobrefaturado ou subfaturado; 2-5% perda de receita em projetos rurais grandes

Multas por Rejeição de NF-e em Faturamento de Topografia

R$1.000 a R$5.000 por NF-e rejeitada; 20-40 horas/mês em correções manuais

Atraso no Recebimento por Verificação Manual de Marcos

60-90 dias em contas a receber; custo de capital 1-2% ao mês sobre faturamento

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence