🇧🇷Brazil

Multas por Não-Conformidade Ambiental em Obras de Infraestrutura

2 verified sources

Definition

Environmental compliance failures in utility construction (particularly erosion control) trigger escalating fines under Federal Law 9,605/1998. Each state SEFAZ implements different environmental control measures, creating jurisdictional complexity. Non-compliance results in temporary or permanent suspension of activities—eliminating project revenue until remediation.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 89,624.89 to R$ 102,102.50 per inspection (construction site example); Heavy fines per Federal Law 9,605/1998 (amounts unspecified but described as severe); Activity suspension = 100% revenue loss until remediation
  • Frequency: Per project; Per state inspection; Cumulative if multiple state licenses violated
  • Root Cause: Manual tracking of 27 state-level environmental licensing regimes; Delayed remediation of detected non-conformities; Insufficient preventive due diligence on third-party erosion control contractors

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian utility construction firms waste significant capital on preventable environmental fines and license revocations. Systematic automation of erosion control documentation, state-by-state license tracking, and compliance audit workflows eliminates penalties and eliminates manual compliance review bottlenecks.

Affected Stakeholders

Environmental Compliance Officer, Project Manager, Safety/Quality Director, Finance/CFO (penalty tracking)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Multas por Ausência de Programa de Conformidade em Contratos com Estado

0.02% per day on contract value (max 10% of contract total); Example: R$ 1,500,000 contract = R$ 300 daily fine = R$ 109,500 over 365 days at cap

Multas por Não-Conformidade com NR-18 e NR-28 em Obras de Construção

R$ 89,624.89 (minimum) to R$ 102,102.50 (maximum) per site inspection for large contractors; Smaller firms: proportionally lower but still significant

Multas e Revogação de Licenças por Não-Conformidade Ambiental

LOGIC: R$ 50.000 a R$ 500.000 por multa administrativa + paralisação de obra (perda de receita de R$ 10.000 a R$ 100.000/dia). Estimativa: 2-5 multas por ano para empresas de médio porte.

Atraso em Liberação de Projetos e Receita por Gargalo de Licenciamento

LOGIC: R$ 30.000 a R$ 150.000/mês de receita perdida durante atraso de licenciamento. Para projeto de R$ 1M, atraso de 6 meses = R$ 180M-900K em receivable drag. Típico: 2-3 projetos/ano por empresa média atrasados.

Aumento de Custos por Atrasos em Documentação Técnica e Retrabalho

LOGIC: R$ 20.000 a R$ 100.000 por ciclo de retrabalho (consultoria ambiental + horas internas). Típico: 1-2 ciclos de rejeição por projeto = R$ 40K-200K por projeto. Em portfólio de 10 projetos/ano: R$ 400K-2M em custo de retrabalho.

Gargalo Operacional e Perda de Capacidade por Gestão Manual de Licenças

LOGIC: 1 analista sênior gasta ~160 horas/ano em gestão manual = R$ 60K-100K anuais (custo Brasil, incluindo eSocial). Em empresa com 10+ projetos simultâneos: pode-se economizar 0.5-1 FTE = R$ 30K-100K/ano.

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence