Schlechte Agentur-Auswahlentscheidungen durch fehlende CAC-Transparenz
Definition
Companies must engage multiple vendors: development agencies (€50–€100/hour), marketing agencies (€30–€60/hour or percentage-based), analytics consultants. Without normalized CAC metrics, contract renewals are based on gut feel rather than ROI. Typical scenario: agency delivers 10% worse CAC than regional benchmark but relationship inertia prevents switching (2–4 week vendor transition + rework risk).
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Underperformance overspend: €30,000–€100,000/year per vendor. Typical portfolio: 3–5 ongoing vendor relationships. Total decision error cost: €90,000–€500,000/year. Vendor transition friction: 80–120 hours @ €50–€100/hour = €4,000–€12,000 per switch.
- Frequency: Annual agency renewal cycles (typically Q4); triggered when CAC trends are reviewed.
- Root Cause: No standardized CAC/LTV benchmarking framework. Manual reporting delays LTV clarity by 4–8 weeks. No vendor scorecard or automated performance dashboard.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Mobile Computing Software Products.
Affected Stakeholders
Head of Growth, Product Manager, Procurement/Vendor Manager, Finance Manager, CEO/Board
Action Plan
Run AI-powered research on this problem. Each action generates a detailed report with sources.
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.