🇩🇪Germany

Mangelhafte Subunternehmer-Verifizierung – Haftungsrisiko & Rework

2 verified sources

Definition

Search result [6] confirms: 'How can main contractors check whether their subcontractors are prequalified?' Answer: Query PQ number via PQ list search. However, manual search is slow, error-prone, and asynchronous: (1) Main contractor compiles subcontractor list; (2) Manually searches each sub on pq-verein.de; (3) Records PQ status (or discovers absence of prequalification); (4) Must halt bid preparation if sub is not prequalified or PQ is expired. For a typical mid-sized project (15–30 subcontractors across trades: Elektro, Lüftung, Heizung, Dach, Fassade), this manual check takes 5–10 hours. Errors occur when: (a) PQ expires between tender and contract execution; (b) Sub operates under multiple legal entities (GmbH variants) and contractor queries wrong registry entry; (c) Commodity group change not reflected in cached data. Result: Bid rejected by client; project lost. If error discovered post-award, contractor must engage new sub, renegotiate contract, absorb cost delta (typically 5–15% markup for emergency sourcing).

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: €15,000–€50,000 per incident. Bid rejection loss: €10k–€40k (lost project margin). Rework cost if discovered post-award: €5k–€20k (emergency sourcing premium, schedule delay, administrative rework). Frequency: 1–3 incidents per firm per year (estimated from mid-sized portfolio). Annual exposure: €15k–€150k.
  • Frequency: Per project cycle (every bid/award phase). Risk elevated during expansion into new commodity groups or sub-supplier transitions.
  • Root Cause: Manual PQ register queries; asynchronous sub data collection; no automated integration between project procurement platform and PQ-VOB registry; sub PQ status cached in spreadsheets (stale data).

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Nonresidential Building Construction.

Affected Stakeholders

Project Manager, Procurement / Einkauf, Compliance Officer, Geschäftsführer (Risk/Legal)

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Präqualifizierungsverzögerung – Verlorene Ausschreibungschancen

€50,000–€300,000 annually per mid-sized firm (estimated 3–8 lost projects/year × €15k–€50k project value per miss). Time cost: 80–160 hours of administrative/legal labor per prequalification cycle @ €50–€75/hour = €4,000–€12,000 per application.

Präqualifizierungs-Registerverletzung – Ausschluss aus öffentlichen Ausschreibungen

€25,000–€100,000+ annually. Revenue loss per disqualification: €30k–€100k (lost 1–2 public projects per quarter). Penalty from Vergabekammer (if bid challenge filed): €1,000–€5,000 per violation. Re-application cost: €2,000–€5,000 (administrative + legal fees).

Volatilität in der Kostenschätzung und Materialpreisinflation

€2–5M annually per mid-sized firm (~€50M revenue) or 3–8% of average bid value; 20–40 hours/month manual re-estimation per bid team

Mangelnde Marktdaten in der Angebotskalkulation führt zu Bid-Verlusten

€1–3M annual bid-value loss per firm (5–10% of target bid pipeline); 15–25% bid loss rate vs. 8–12% industry benchmark

GoBD Verstöße und Betriebsprüfungs-Risiken in Angebotsdokumentation

€50K–€500K per audit cycle (~€20K–€100K per year average); €5,000–€50,000 per GoBD violation; 2–5% margin reconstruction if audit finds undocumented cost changes

Manuelle Angebotsbearbeitung und Bottleneck-Kosten durch fehlende Automatisierung

€500K–€2M annually per firm (40–60 hours per bid × €50–80/hour × 150–250 bids/year); 5–15% error rate increase in rushed bids; 3–8% bid volume loss due to missed deadlines

Request Deep Analysis

🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence