🇩🇪Germany
Betrug in wiederkehrenden Zahlungen
2 verified sources
Definition
Recurring payments vulnerable without integrated fraud prevention, common in service subscriptions.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: 1-3% transaction value in fraud losses
- Frequency: Per fraudulent transaction
- Root Cause: No integrated fraud ML in billing flow
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Security Systems Services.
Affected Stakeholders
Finance, IT Security
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Unlock to reveal
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Unlock to reveal
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
$99$39
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Kosten durch Nacharbeiten bei Inbetriebnahme
€10,000-50,000 per failed project in rework and downtime
Überstunden und Rush-Kosten bei Inbetriebnahme
20-40 Stunden Überstunden pro Projekt à €80-120/Stunde
Kostenexplosion durch manuelle Change Orders
€5.000 - €20.000 pro Rush Change Order; 40 Stunden/Monat Overhead
Kapazitätsverlust durch Fehlalarme
20-95% monitoring capacity loss, €10,000+/month in idle time
Gemeindliche Feinabgaben für Fehlalarme
€500-5,000 fine per repeat false alarm + 10-20 hours/month admin
Leerlauf durch Inventar-Tracking-Fehler
20-40 Stunden/Monat manuelle Tracking + 10-20% Kapazitätsverlust (€50.000/Jahr pro Team)
Request Deep Analysis
🇩🇪 Be first to access this market's intelligence