🇮🇳India

संचरण नुकसान और व्हीलिंग शुल्क का राजस्व अपवर्जन (Transmission Loss & Wheeling Charge Revenue Leakage)

2 verified sources

Definition

PPAs embed transmission loss deductions in the billing formula itself. Example: If a project generates 100 units, and transmission loss Z% = 5%, developer receives payment for only 95 units. In MP model, an additional 2% wheeling charge is deducted + 4% subsidy claimed by MP TRADECO (which is rarely passed back). These stacked deductions (6-10% in some cases) are borne entirely by the generator, not shared with off-takers. Billing is automated but non-transparent—developers cannot dispute transmission loss percentages.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: ₹300-600 crores annually (sector-wide); per 500 MW project: ₹3-5 crores/year lost to wheeling/transmission deductions; per 50 MW project: ₹30-50 lakhs/year
  • Frequency: Every billing cycle (monthly) on 100% of energy injected
  • Root Cause: Centralized transmission model where state-owned entities (MP TRADECO, state grids) retain wheeling and transmission losses as revenue. Lack of real-time loss allocation transparency and fixed contractual deduction formulas with no dispute mechanism.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Wind generators across India lose ₹300-600 crores annually to transmission/wheeling deductions. A 500 MW wind farm loses ₹3-5 crores/year. Real-time transmission loss forecasting and negotiated wheeling exemptions for green energy can recover 1-2% of annual revenue.

Affected Stakeholders

Wind Power Developers, Project Finance Teams, DISCOM Billing Officers, State Trading Entities

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

विलंबित भुगतान और नकद प्रवाह में खिंचाव (Delayed Payments & Cash Flow Drag)

₹500-2,000 crores annually (sector-wide); individual developers: ₹2-10 crores/year working capital tied up; opportunity cost: 5-8% annual financing at ~18-22% cost of funds = ₹10-18 lakhs per ₹10 crore delayed annually per developer

प्रतिक्रियाशील ऊर्जा शुल्क से अतिरिक्त राजस्व ड्रेन (Reactive Power Charge Revenue Drain)

₹50-100 crores annually (sector-wide); per 500 MW project: ₹50-75 lakhs/year; per 50 MW project: ₹5-7.5 lakhs/year; estimated 2-3% of annual revenue lost

पवन ऊर्जा अवरोधन और क्षतिपूर्ति दावों में देरी

₹500-1,500 crores/year estimated (5-7% × 43.7 GW installed capacity × capacity factor × wholesale tariff). Per MW: ₹12-35 lakhs/year in lost revenue recovery.

नवीकरणीय खरीद बाध्यता (RPO) गैर-अनुपालन दंड

₹200-500 crores/year across 15+ Indian states with RPO shortfalls (estimated at ₹50-100 crores per state for wind RPO misses).

ग्रिड लचीलापन में निवेश की कमी से उत्पन्न पूर्वानुमान त्रुटियां

₹100-300 crores/year (estimated from 5-7% curtailment + ₹0.5-2 crore/state in forecasting penalties). Rajasthan RUVNL alone: ₹30-50 crores/year in unquantified 'penalties.'

विद्युत उत्पादन विचलन दंड से राजस्व हानि

₹ 48% revenue loss (wind), ₹ 11% revenue loss (solar/hybrid). For a 100 MW wind farm generating ₹50 crore annually, potential loss = ₹24 crore/year.

Request Deep Analysis

🇮🇳 Be first to access this market's intelligence