Defense and Space Manufacturing Business Guide
Get Solutions, Not Just Problems
We documented 34 challenges in Defense and Space Manufacturing. Now get the actionable solutions — vendor recommendations, process fixes, and cost-saving strategies that actually work.
Skip the wait — get instant access
- All 34 documented pains
- Business solutions for each pain
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
All 34 Documented Cases
Direct Financial Penalties, Terminations, and Debarment from DFARS / CMMC Breaches
$10M–$500M+ per affected contractor when combining lost contract value, FCA treble damages, unallowable penalties, and excluded future awardsMultiple sources describe that DFARS and CMMC violations can lead to fines, contract termination, suspension of payments, and even debarment from future federal contracting, which is effectively a catastrophic revenue loss for defense and space manufacturers. The DoD memo on DFARS 252.204‑7012 lists withholding payments, foregoing options, and terminating contracts as remedies, while DFARS‑focused legal analyses and compliance advisories highlight suspension, debarment, FCA liability, and criminal exposure.
Poor Pricing and Investment Decisions from Inaccurate Rates and Non‑Compliant Data
Forward‑pricing and incurred cost audit results frequently force contractors to adjust indirect rates and estimating methodologies; misestimation can swing margins by several percentage points on large, multi‑year defense programs, equating to recurring multi‑million‑dollar impacts on both winning and executing contracts.Weak DCAA audit readiness often reflects deeper inaccuracies in indirect rates, cost pools, and estimating practices. These inaccuracies drive under‑recovery on some contracts and over‑pricing on others, distorting bid strategy and capital allocation for defense and space manufacturers.
Labor Mischarging and Cost Misallocation Uncovered by DCAA Floor Checks
DoD IG and DOJ enforcement actions in the aerospace/defense sector regularly involve multi‑million‑dollar settlements for labor mischarging and misallocation; beyond legal settlements, affected contractors lose recovery of the mischarged costs, incur investigation and remediation expenses, and may suffer suspension or debarment risk on future awards.DCAA labor‑charging and floor‑check audits routinely uncover mischarging of labor hours, falsified timesheets, or improper allocation of costs to government contracts. When systemic, these issues result in disallowed costs, repayments, and sometimes civil or criminal fraud actions.
Loss of Current and Future Contract Revenue from Cyber / DFARS Non‑Compliance in Bid Phase
$5M–$100M+ contract revenue lost per disqualified bid; multi‑year revenue pipeline losses when contractors are found ineligible or debarredDefense and space manufacturers are being ruled non‑responsive or ineligible during source selection because they cannot demonstrate required DFARS 252.204‑7012 / NIST 800‑171 or CMMC compliance, causing immediate loss of contract awards and future bidding eligibility. This is a recurring, systemic bleed because cyber clauses are now standard in DoD solicitations and are enforced across all new awards.