Loss of equipment and terminal capacity from prolonged container time
Definition
When containers are not picked up or returned on time, carriers’ equipment and terminal yard slots are tied up, reducing available capacity for revenue‑generating moves. D&D fees compensate partially, but they do not fully offset the opportunity cost of containers and yard space stuck in non‑productive dwell.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Opportunity cost equivalent to losing multiple container turns per year per unit; with daily detention fees often only $50–$100, lost revenue from missed trips can exceed fee income by thousands of dollars per container annually[3][5]
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: Detention is explicitly a container rental charge when a box stays outside the port beyond agreed free time, and demurrage is charged when it sits too long at the terminal.[3][4][6] Each day beyond free time is a day the container and its yard slot cannot be used for another shipment; driver detention at customer sites similarly removes trucks from productive hours, as carriers levy modest detention fees to offset idle time but still lose potential loads.[5]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Freight and Package Transportation.
Affected Stakeholders
Equipment and fleet managers at ocean carriers, Terminal yard managers, Truckload and intermodal carrier operations, Dispatchers and planners, Network optimization and capacity planners
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$1,500-$3,000 per container from detention + lost equipment turn; 5-10% of returns miss window weekly • $1,500-$3,000 per container from detention + lost turn capacity; weekly occurrences on 5-10% of returns • $1,500-$3,000 per container from detention; 5-10% of inbound containers affected; weekly impact
Current Workarounds
3PL AR clerk manually compiles D&D invoices from multiple carriers; reconciles to shipment records via spreadsheet; sends aging report • 3PL dispatch uses manual board + phone; owner-operators given verbal instructions; no geofence/ETA enforcement • 3PL dispatcher manually schedules returns via spreadsheet; last-mile supervisor receives priority list via email
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
- https://www.hapag-lloyd.com/en/online-business/digital-insights-dock/insights/2024/06/detention-and-demurrage--what-is-the-d-d-charge-in-shipping---.html
- https://www.fourkites.com/blogs/demurrage-and-detention-charges-whats-the-difference/
- https://www.weberlogistics.com/blog/california-logistics-blog/detention-charges-in-shipping
Related Business Risks
Systemic under‑billing and billing‑error write‑offs on detention & demurrage
Runaway detention & demurrage fees from poor coordination
Disputed detention & demurrage charges and rework
Delayed cash collection due to contested D&D invoices
Regulatory exposure and penalties over non‑compliant D&D billing
Opportunistic use of D&D as de‑facto storage or leverage
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence