Poor Investigation Quality Leading to Rework, Reopened Claims, and Adverse Outcomes
Definition
When SIU investigations are incomplete or poorly documented, claims are mishandled—either legitimate claims are wrongly delayed/denied or fraudulent claims are paid. This drives rework (reopened claims, appeals, and litigation), customer compensation, and write‑offs.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Low single‑digit percent of claim costs as avoidable leakage plus incremental defense and settlement costs on disputed SIU‑handled claims (industry‑wide, fraud and anti‑fraud failures cost billions annually)
- Frequency: Daily
- Root Cause: State anti‑fraud best‑practice guidance and carrier SIU manuals stress thorough analysis, proper evidence gathering, and documentation because failures in these areas are common and create exposure.[3][5][8] Thomson Reuters notes that lack of up‑to‑date data and poor collaboration causes wrong decisions on claim payments, a direct quality failure.[4]
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Insurance Carriers.
Affected Stakeholders
SIU investigators, Claims adjusters, Legal/claims counsel, Customer service representatives, Compliance officers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
$100K-$800K annually in inappropriate claim approvals, member dissatisfaction leading to group dissolution, administrative overhead of manual reconciliation, repricing/rebrand costs • $1M-$10M+ annually in duplicate investigation costs, claims held in reserve longer, treaty disputes, potential arbitration costs, relationship deterioration affecting future business • $200K-$2M+ per large account annually in lost reserves, repricing requests, alternative risk transfer costs, and internal rework labor
Current Workarounds
Commercial accounts chase SIU status via broker intermediary; manual claim reconciliation; finance teams manually track disputed amounts in separate systems; appeals filed without complete investigation documentation • Group administrators manually track claim statuses through spreadsheets; members contact group directly creating shadow communication channels; group finance teams manually reconcile claimed vs. paid amounts • Manual claim file reviews, email chains between adjusters/SIU, handwritten notes, Excel-based claim tracking, memory-based investigator assignments
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
- https://www.myfloridacfo.com/docs-sf/investigative-and-forensic-services-libraries/difs-documents/difs-best-practices-final-2022.pdf
- https://www.companionlife.com/images/uploads/documents/Companion_Life_2023_SIU_Policies_and_Procedures_Manual.pdf
- https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/3-crucial-steps-to-set-insurers-siu-departments-up-for-success
Related Business Risks
Missed and Late Identification of Fraudulent Claims Leading to Improper Paid Losses
Inefficient SIU Investigations Driving Excess Labor and Vendor Spend
Extended Claim Cycle Times Due to Manual and Data‑Constrained SIU Reviews
SIU Investigator Time Consumed by Low‑Value Cases and Manual Tasks
Regulatory Non‑Compliance with SIU and Anti‑Fraud Requirements Leading to Fines and Corrective Actions
Systemic Insurance Fraud and Abuse Outpacing SIU Detection
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence