Manual Setlist and Performance Reporting Causing Lost Royalties and Admin Overhead
Definition
To collect live performance royalties for concerts and bar/club gigs, many PROs require artists to manually submit setlists and venue details. Guidance from industry experts notes this can be a 'pretty good chunk of change', yet many artists either do not know about these programs or fail to file, leading to both administrative burden and lost revenue from unreported shows.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Commonly hundreds to low thousands of dollars per active touring artist per year; scaled across tens of thousands of acts this represents multi‑million‑dollar annual under‑collection
- Frequency: Weekly for active touring artists; quarterly when distributions are run
- Root Cause: Under‑automated reporting systems that put the burden on artists to enter every show, setlist, and venue; low awareness of live performance royalty claims processes; lack of integration between ticketing/venue systems and PROs so performances are not reported automatically.
Why This Matters
This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Musicians.
Affected Stakeholders
Touring artists and bands, Independent songwriters performing live, Tour managers, Artist managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Across a management roster, under‑collection often adds up to tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in missed live performance royalties and reduced commissions, while absorbing unpaid coordination hours. • Each active ensemble can forfeit $500–$5,000/year in aggregate songwriter performance royalties depending on volume and scale of shows; at catalog/label level this compounds into large sums across rosters and publishing catalogs. • Each missed high‑profile performance can be worth hundreds to thousands of dollars in performance royalties, especially for larger premieres, and aggregated across many sync campaigns this becomes a meaningful though less visible loss.
Current Workarounds
Artist keeps a partial gig list in a spreadsheet or booking email thread and a song list in another tool, then occasionally batch‑keys the information into ASCAP/BMI/SESAC portals, often missing many past shows due to time limits. • Artist or assistant periodically sits down and manually reconstructs gigs from memory, calendars, emails, and social posts, then types setlists and venue details into PRO web portals or mobile apps, sometimes tracking shows in Excel or notes first. • Artist or tour manager manually tracks shows and setlists in notes, spreadsheets, or memory, then periodically logs into each PRO portal or mobile app to retype dates, venues, and songs or ends up not filing at all.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Unclaimed and Misdirected Performance Royalties Due to Registration and Affiliation Gaps
Slow, Multi‑Month Lag Between Performance and Royalty Payment
Suboptimal PRO and Publishing Choices Reducing Net Royalty Income
Unpaid Sync Licensing Fees and Delayed Royalties
Slow Royalty Collection and Verification in Sync Deals
Manual Delays and Inefficiencies in Sync Licensing Clearance
Request Deep Analysis
🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence