🇺🇸United States

Pumped Water Not Billed Due to High Non-Revenue Water

3 verified sources

Definition

Utilities routinely pump and treat large volumes of water that never generate revenue because they are lost through leakage or never reach the meter, classified as non‑revenue water (NRW). Industry guidance notes that utilities incur both **real losses** (leakage) and **apparent losses** when customer consumption is not properly measured or billed, directly eroding revenue.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Commonly 15–30% of system input volume for many utilities; for a mid‑sized utility pumping $10M/year worth of water, this implies $1.5–3M/year in revenue leakage.
  • Frequency: Daily
  • Root Cause: Aging distribution mains and service lines, lack of continuous monitoring, reliance on infrequent manual/drive‑by meter reading, and weak water auditing practices that fail to reconcile system input with billed consumption and identify abnormal loss patterns.

Why This Matters

This pain point represents a significant opportunity for B2B solutions targeting Utilities Administration.

Affected Stakeholders

Chief Financial Officer, Revenue Manager, Water Utility General Manager, Billing and Metering Supervisors, Distribution System Engineers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

$1.5-3M/year bulk sales losses • $1.5-3M/year bulk water revenue leakage • $1.5-3M/year C&I apparent losses

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Excel adjustment entries for NRW • Excel dashboards comparing plant output to C&I reads • Excel models estimating pump/treat volumes with NRW buffers.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Apparent Losses from Meter Under‑Registration and Billing Errors

Apparent losses typically account for several percentage points of system input; for a utility with $20M in annual water sales, even a 3–5% apparent loss equates to $0.6–1M/year of preventable revenue leakage.

Excess Operating Costs from Undetected Leakage and Main Breaks

For a medium utility, excess production plus emergency repair costs linked to unmanaged leakage can easily reach hundreds of thousands to low millions of dollars per year, depending on energy prices and break frequency.

Inefficient Manual Meter Reading and Truck Rolls

For large rural systems, recurring field reading and re‑read truck rolls can consume many thousands of labor hours and tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in wages, fuel, and vehicle wear, as evidenced by the savings realized after AMI deployment.

Customer Credits and Adjustments from Undetected Customer-Side Leaks

High‑bill disputes and leak‑related bill adjustments can cumulatively cost a mid‑size utility hundreds of thousands of dollars per year in forgiven charges and staff time, based on the scale of reductions seen when proactive leak alerts are implemented.

Delayed Revenue Recognition from Infrequent and Unreliable Reads

If 5–10% of accounts in a 50,000‑customer utility are routinely estimated or delayed, this can defer hundreds of thousands of dollars of cash each billing cycle and require later corrections that complicate revenue forecasting.

Lost System Capacity from High Real Losses in Distribution Network

If 15–20% of treated water is lost as leakage, a utility may face tens of millions in premature capital spending on new sources or plant upgrades instead of deferring those investments by recovering capacity through loss control.

Request Deep Analysis

🇺🇸 Be first to access this market's intelligence