Cost of Poor Quality in POE Non-Compliance
Definition
Inadequate POE results in buildings not meeting design intentions, leading to higher energy consumption, waste mismanagement, and poor occupant satisfaction, manifesting as elevated operational expenses and rework.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ per building in excess lifecycle costs from unaddressed performance gaps[1][4]
- Frequency: Ongoing post-occupancy, every 6-12 months initially then 3-5 years
- Root Cause: Manual POE processes fail to capture real-world data vs. design models, leading to undetected inefficiencies
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Regenerative Design players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 50,000+ annually per building on lifecycle costs from POE gaps. Automation of ecosystem health tracking eliminates this risk.
Affected Stakeholders
Building managers, Regenerative designers, Facility operators
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Waste Management Overruns from Inadequate POE
Capacity Loss from POE Performance Gaps
Non-compliance with EPBC Act
Rework from Inaccurate Baseline Mapping
Idle Time During Manual Site Observation
Verification Non-Compliance and Credit Issuance Failure
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence