Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch Portierungsstreitigkeiten
Definition
The ACCC notes that where carriers or CSPs are unable to agree on the terms and conditions upon which number portability is provided, including cost recovery and pricing, the Commission may be required to arbitrate disputes under the Telecommunications Act 1997.[2][4] Because LNP involves inter‑carrier wholesale charges whose quantum depends on operational events (successful ports, reversals, complex vs simple categories), any discrepancy in records leads to billing disputes. Without automated, reconciled LNP event logs, carriers often withhold payment or short‑pay invoices pending manual resolution, stretching DSO (days sales outstanding) for LNP revenue well beyond standard wholesale billing terms. For example, if 10–20% of LNP invoices by value are placed in dispute and remain unresolved for 60–120 days longer than normal, a carrier with AUD 2–5 million in annual LNP‑related wholesale flows can have AUD 200,000–1,000,000 tied up in working capital, incurring financing costs or opportunity cost on that capital.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Quantified (LOGIC): For AUD 3 million in annual LNP‑related inter‑carrier charges with 15% in dispute delayed by an additional 90 days, approx. AUD 112,500 of working capital is locked (0.15 × 3,000,000 × 90/360). At a 6–10% cost of capital, this equates to AUD 6,750–11,250 per year in financing cost, plus risk of write‑offs or negotiated discounts of 2–5% of disputed amounts (AUD 9,000–22,500). Total annual drag: roughly AUD 15,000–35,000, higher for larger carriers.
- Frequency: Quarterly; aligns with wholesale billing cycles and the timing of ACCC/ACMA‑related dispute escalations.
- Root Cause: Lack of a shared, authoritative record of LNP events; inconsistent application of ACCC pricing principles; manual reconciliation between carriers; absence of automated dispute‑management workflows tied to porting data.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Australian 🇦🇺 telcos typically lock 60–120 days of LNP‑related receivables in dispute with other carriers. Automating evidence capture and reconciliation of port events cuts dispute duration and accelerates cash by tens of days.
Affected Stakeholders
Head of Wholesale & Interconnect, Credit & Collections Manager, Treasury Manager, CFO
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Kostenfehler und Streitigkeiten bei Portierungsentgelten
Hohe manuelle Abwicklungskosten für Portierungen
Kosten durch Fehlportierungen und Notfall-Rückführungen
Kapazitätsverluste durch Portierungs-Backlogs
Kundenabwanderung durch langsame oder fehlerhafte Rufnummernportierung
Fehlende oder fehlerhafte Interconnect‑Erlöserfassung
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence