🇧🇷Brazil

Multas por Não-Conformidade com Segurança de Barragens de Rejeitos

2 verified sources

Definition

Law 14.066/2020 prohibited upstream tailings dam models and mandated emergency action plans. Updated NR 22 (Dec 2024) imposed stricter restrictions on permissible downstream installations. Regulatory ambiguity persists: ANM's controversial decision on waste/tailings ownership (outside mining title boundaries) and MTE's conditional relaxation create legal dispute risk. Fines reach R$ 1 billion for dam collapse disasters.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 1,000,000,000 (R$ 1 billion) for dam collapse disasters; legal dispute costs (litigation, expert review, operational delays) estimated at R$ 500,000–R$ 5,000,000 for contested compliance interpretations.
  • Frequency: Per dam/waste storage facility per regulatory change (2–3 technical notes per quarter from SEFAZ/ANM); disaster liability is latent but high-impact.
  • Root Cause: Regulatory drift (Ordinance MTE 2,105/2024 relaxed requirements post-Dec 2024); inconsistency between ANM decisions and mining legislation; insufficient legal clarity on waste ownership boundaries.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Lime/gypsum miners with tailings or waste storage face catastrophic fine exposure (R$ 1 billion) and operational shutdowns. Automated dam safety compliance audits, real-time installation monitoring, and emergency plan version control eliminate regulatory dispute risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Environmental Compliance Manager, Safety Officer, Operations Director, Risk/Legal Counsel

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Custo de Remediation e Perda de Direitos Minerários por Atraso de Pagamento TAH

R$ 4,746.04 per late payment instance; escalation to court enforcement (judicial costs, interest, attorney fees ~R$ 5,000–R$ 20,000 per case); loss of mineral rights = total exploration/mining asset write-off (variable by site value, typically R$ 100,000–R$ 10,000,000+).

Multa por Emissão Excessiva de Particulados e Suspensão de Operações

Estimated R$ 50,000–150,000 per violation (fines) + operational suspension costs (R$ 20,000–80,000/day production loss). Conservative annual risk: R$ 100,000–300,000 for non-compliant facilities.

Paralisação de Produção por Falha em Controle de Poeira

Estimated R$ 20,000–80,000 per shutdown day (lost production revenue + penalty costs). Annual capacity loss: R$ 300,000–2,400,000 for typical limestone facility (20–30 suspended days).

Sobrecusto em Retrabalho de Correção de Conformidade Ambiental

Estimated R$ 7,000–15,000 per audit cycle × 2–3 cycles/year = R$ 14,000–45,000 annual consultant costs. Additional equipment retrofit costs: R$ 30,000–100,000 per corrective action implementation.

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence