Anti-Siphoning Breach Penalties
Definition
Subscription providers cannot hold exclusive rights to anti-siphoning events without free-to-air partners; breaches risk rights loss and penalties.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 50,000+ civil penalty per breach; potential loss of AUD millions in rights value
- Frequency: Per unauthorised exclusive broadcast
- Root Cause: Poor management of sports rights allocation and blackout windows
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Cable and Satellite Programming wastes AUD 50,000+ per violation on anti-siphoning fines. Automation of rights scheduling compliance prevents deal invalidation.
Affected Stakeholders
Rights Acquisition Manager, Programming Director, Compliance Team
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
ACMA Blackout Compliance Fines
Gambling Ad Broadcast Fines
Ungebuchte und falsch bewertete Werbeplätze im TV- und Streaming-Geschäft
Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch manuelle Kampagnenabnahme und Abrechnung
GST-Fehlbeträge und ATO-Risiko durch falsche Verbuchung von Werbeumsätzen
Produktivitätsverlust durch manuelle Disposition und Trafficking von Werbekampagnen
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence