🇦🇺Australia

Falsche oder unvollständige Rechtezuordnung bei Tantiemen

3 verified sources

Definition

For Australian retransmission royalties, Screenrights divides money collected from retransmitters into TV and radio pools, then into pools per network or channel.[2] Program value is influenced by (1) the ratings of the retransmitted channel, (2) the broadcast time (primetime vs off‑peak with multipliers), and (3) the duration of the copy.[2] Screenrights’ Scheme of Allocation further allocates royalties between different copyright components in a program, such as film, script and sound recordings.[2] Members who register programs warrant that they hold relevant rights and specify their claimed shares.[2] Inaccurate programme metadata (wrong duration, incorrect channel, missing primetime flags) or mis‑stated copyright splits leads to under‑payment for some rights owners and over‑payment to others. Because these schemes involve large aggregated pools and complex splits, even modest error rates in input data cause meaningful revenue leakage or disputes, especially for high‑rating channels and long‑running series.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified (logic): If program valuation for a given title is mis‑stated by as little as 10% due to incorrect broadcast time or duration, a catalogue with AUD 200,000 per year in Screenrights royalties can mis‑allocate ~AUD 20,000 annually. In complex co‑productions where script and sound‑recording shares are mis‑registered by 10–20 percentage points, affected rightsholders can lose AUD 5,000–50,000 over a four‑year distribution window depending on channel rating and volume of retransmits.
  • Frequency: Recurring whenever new programs, splits or catalogue buys are registered with Screenrights; crystallises during each annual distribution when mis‑allocated amounts are paid out and become difficult or uneconomic to recover.
  • Root Cause: Manual preparation of registration files; lack of unified rights management across film, script and sound recordings; poor control over versioning when contracts are amended; absence of systematic reconciliation between reported schedules/ratings and Screenrights metadata.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Cable and satellite programming businesses in Australia 🇦🇺 risk 5–15% misallocation of secondary royalties due to poor metadata and manual split management. Centralised rights and royalty systems that validate title data, splits and usage against Screenrights rules can redirect tens of thousands of AUD back to the correct owners each year.

Affected Stakeholders

Royalty & Participations Manager, Rights & Contracts Manager, Programme Scheduling and Traffic Teams, Finance and Reporting Teams, External auditors focused on rights income

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Verfallene und nicht beanspruchte Retransmissions-Tantiemen

Quantified (logic + benchmarks): In a comparable market, cable and satellite retransmission royalties exceeded USD 270 million in a single year.[3] Applying a conservative 1–3% non‑claim rate to a mid‑sized Australian catalogue exposure of AUD 1–5 million in annual secondary rights yields ~AUD 10,000–150,000 per year in royalties that can expire unclaimed per studio/broadcaster. For large multichannel operators, cumulative leakage over a four‑year distribution window can exceed AUD 500,000.

Ungebuchte und falsch bewertete Werbeplätze im TV- und Streaming-Geschäft

LOGIC-Schätzung: 1–3 % des jährlichen Werbeumsatzes als Erlösleck; bei 50 Mio. AUD Werbeumsatz ≈ 0,5–1,5 Mio. AUD p.a. an nicht realisierten oder zurückgegebenen Werbeerlösen; zusätzlich 0,25–0,5 FTE im Traffic/Finance-Team (≈ 30.000–60.000 AUD p.a.) für manuelle Klärung von Discrepancies.

Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch manuelle Kampagnenabnahme und Abrechnung

LOGIC-Schätzung: 10–20 zusätzliche DSO-Tage durch manuelle Konsolidierung von Leistungsnachweisen; bei 50 Mio. AUD Umsatz ≈ 1,4–2,7 Mio. AUD zusätzlich gebundenes Working Capital und 70.000–215.000 AUD p.a. Finanzierungskosten (bei 5–8 % Kapitalkosten).

GST-Fehlbeträge und ATO-Risiko durch falsche Verbuchung von Werbeumsätzen

LOGIC-Schätzung: Bei 50 Mio. AUD Jahreswerbeumsatz und 2 % falsch erfassten Umsätzen ≈ 100.000 AUD GST-Fehlbetrag; potenzielle ATO‑Strafe 25.000–50.000 AUD pro Prüfungsfall plus Zinsen von ca. 5–8 % p.a. auf den Fehlbetrag.

Produktivitätsverlust durch manuelle Disposition und Trafficking von Werbekampagnen

LOGIC-Schätzung: 20–40 Stunden pro Monat und FTE an nicht-wertschöpfender manueller Arbeit; bei 10 FTE und 100–150 AUD vollkostenbasiertem Stundensatz ≈ 240.000–720.000 AUD Opportunitätskosten p.a.

Fehlende oder fehlerhafte Abrechnung von Affiliate-Gebühren

Quantified (logic-based): For a mid‑size Australian pay‑TV operator with ~AUD 300m annual subscription revenue and ~40% paid as affiliate/programming fees (AUD 120m), 1–3% miscalculation or reporting errors in affiliate fee settlements equals approximately AUD 1.2–3.6m per year in revenue leakage or over‑payments. For a larger operator with AUD 1b in subscription revenue and similar cost ratios, the range is AUD 4–12m per year.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence