STP and Payroll Compliance Failures
Definition
Variable schedules from poor optimization complicate STP reporting, Superannuation Guarantee, and PAYG withholding.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: AUD 3,300 minimum ATO penalty per STP failure; SG charge up to 200% shortfall
- Frequency: Per payroll cycle (monthly/quarterly)
- Root Cause: Manual scheduling creates irregular hours without real-time payroll integration
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Home health care providers risk AUD 3,000+ ATO fines per breach from scheduling errors. Automated rostering ensures STP compliance.
Affected Stakeholders
Payroll Officers, HR Managers
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Evidence Sources:
Related Business Risks
Overtime and Travel Cost Overruns
Capacity Loss from Scheduling Bottlenecks
Billing Delays from Scheduling Errors
WHS Risk from Inadequate Aide Competency
Provider Supervision Non-Compliance Fines
Supervision Time Overruns
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence