Budgetüberschreitungen durch unzureichende Controlling-Puffer
Definition
Screen Australia requires that production budgets for funded projects include a contingency of **10% of below‑the‑line (BTL) costs for feature film and online/direct‑to‑audience projects and 8% for television projects**, with an overall project budget cap under AUD 30 million.[1] When budgets are created and monitored in spreadsheets, producers frequently either under‑provision this contingency or fail to update it as scope changes, leading to unmanaged cost overruns that cannot be passed on to Screen Australia or other funders once finance plans are locked. Industry budgeting guides for Australian video production recommend an additional **10–20% buffer for unforeseen costs** such as weather delays, reshoots, or permit issues, explicitly warning that failing to plan for these creates budget overruns.[2] Given that typical commercial video productions in Australia range from **AUD 7,500 to 100,000+**, and brand/advertising productions commonly sit in the **AUD 40,000–100,000** band,[3] each 10% unplanned overrun translates to **AUD 4,000–10,000** of margin erosion per job. Across a slate of 20 productions per year, this adds up to **AUD 80,000–200,000** in avoidable cost drift, even before considering larger TV or feature budgets governed by Screen Australia rules. Logic-based extrapolation from contingency requirements and market price ranges supports a typical overrun band of **8–15% of original budget** where structured cost reporting and real-time variance analysis are absent.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Quantified: 8–15 % Budgetüberschreitung je Projekt; bei typischen Werbeproduktionen von 40.000–100.000 AUD entspricht das ca. 3.000–15.000 AUD pro Produktion, bzw. 80.000–200.000 AUD pro Jahr bei 20 Projekten.
- Frequency: Wiederkehrend bei nahezu jeder mittelgroßen Produktion; besonders sichtbar bei Screen-Australia-finanzierten Projekten mit strikten Caps und bei Agenturen mit 10+ Produktionen pro Jahr.
- Root Cause: Fragmentierte Budgeterstellung in Excel, fehlende automatische Verknüpfung zwischen Kalkulation, Änderungsaufträgen und Ist-Kosten; mangelnde Einhaltung der geforderten 8–10%-Kontingenz und fehlendes Szenario-Tracking.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Media-Produktionsfirmen in Australien 🇦🇺 verschwenden jährlich 8–15 % jedes Produktionsbudgets durch schlecht kontrollierte Mehrkosten. Automatisierung von Budgetierung, Änderungsverfolgung und Controlling der BTL-Kosten reduziert diese Abweichungen massiv.
Affected Stakeholders
Executive Producer, Line Producer, Production Manager, Head of Production, Finance Manager, Agency Producer (bei Marken/Agenturproduktionen)
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Nicht fakturierte Mehrleistungen bei Änderungswünschen und Zusatzdrehs
Ungeplante Kosten für Lizenzen, Drehgenehmigungen und Set-Aufbau
Fehlentscheidungen bei Crew- und Ressourceneinsatz durch fehlende Kostentransparenz
Union Compliance Errors in Production Payroll
ATO Superannuation and PAYG Penalties
Fair Work Underpayment Fines
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence