🇦🇺Australia

Eilfracht- und Überstundenzuschläge durch JIT-Engpässe

3 verified sources

Definition

Kanban/JIT systems aim to cut warehousing and carrying costs by triggering replenishment only when bins reach a defined level, often via scanning and simple bin signals.[2][5][8] When this process is manual or poorly integrated with supplier lead times, parts run out unexpectedly. To avoid line stoppages, planners resort to same‑day couriers, airfreight, or weekend production with overtime rates. Industry guidance on JIT notes that businesses trade lower holding costs against higher vulnerability to disruption.[4][8] Typical Australian emergency freight for industrial components can cost AUD 500–2,000 per shipment domestically and more for international air. If a mid‑size auto‑parts plant faces 3–5 such incidents per month due to Kanban/JIT shortages, that alone is AUD 18,000–120,000 per year in freight. Adding overtime (e.g. 10–20 overtime hours per month across key workcentres at 1.5x pay) gives a further AUD 30,000–80,000 per year. Combined, a logic‑based estimate is around AUD 100,000–300,000 in avoidable annual cost overruns linked directly to poorly controlled Kanban/JIT replenishment.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Logic-based estimate: AUD 18,000–120,000/year in expedited freight plus AUD 30,000–80,000/year in overtime to catch up after JIT shortages = ~AUD 100,000–300,000 per plant per year.
  • Frequency: Ongoing: several emergency shipments and catch‑up shifts per month in plants with manual Kanban monitoring or unstable supplier performance.
  • Root Cause: Manual scanning or paper cards, lack of integrated reorder points with real lead times, inadequate safety stock for high‑variability demand, and poor supplier performance visibility.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian 🇦🇺 automotive parts manufacturers waste AUD 100,000–300,000 annually on expedited freight and overtime created by Kanban/JIT stockouts. Automating inventory thresholds, demand forecasting and supplier alerts cuts these emergency costs.

Affected Stakeholders

Supply Chain Manager, Production Planner, Warehouse Manager, Finance Manager, Procurement Manager

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Umsatzverluste durch Fehlmengen und nicht erfüllte OEM-Abrufe

Logic-based estimate: 1–3 % of annual revenue due to JIT/Kanban‑related delivery failures. For an auto‑parts plant with AUD 50–150 million turnover, this equals ~AUD 0.5–4.5 million per year in lost sales and penalties.

Fehlentscheidungen durch fehlende Transparenz in Kanban-/JIT-Beständen

Logic-based estimate: 2–5 % of inventory value lost annually. For AUD 5–15 million of inventory, this is ~AUD 100,000–750,000 per year in write‑offs and excess carrying cost.

Cost of Poor Quality from Chargeback Disputes

AUD 10,000+ fines per excessive ratio incident; 2% of monthly sales volume (e.g., AUD 10k on AUD 500k sales)

Supplier Indemnification Delays under ACL

AUD thousands per repair (labour + parts); margins forgone on replacements during delays

Rush Order Costs from ECO Delays

AUD 5,000+ in rush charges per delayed ECO implementation[2]

Idle Equipment from ECO Bottlenecks

20-40 hours of idle equipment per ECO cycle[2][5]

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence