🇦🇺Australia

Kosten durch Hafenliegegeld und Terminallagergebühren

3 verified sources

Definition

Intermodal container drayage in Australia is highly time‑sensitive at ports like Botany, Melbourne and Fremantle. Poor coordination between rail slots, truck availability, and terminal cut‑off times causes containers to sit past their free‑time, triggering demurrage and storage fees. Industry discussions and tariff sheets typically show daily storage of AUD 150–300+ per container after a short free period at major Australian terminals. If drayage scheduling is done manually in spreadsheets and email, 5–10% of container moves can easily incur 2–3 extra chargeable days due to missed pickups, incorrect booking details or lack of real‑time visibility of vessel and train delays. For a rail‑linked operator handling 10,000+ containers annually, this translates into hundreds of thousands of dollars in pass‑through charges, many of which cannot be successfully on‑charged to customers because they stem from internal coordination errors. Modern TMS providers explicitly highlight that congestion and coordination complexity in intermodal moves lead to costly delays, and promote real‑time visibility to avoid containers getting stuck at terminals.[1] Australian providers stress that integrated systems and paperless processes are key to predictable, low‑cost container flows, implicitly positioning themselves against these avoidable storage costs.[2]

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified (Logic): Typical Australian terminal storage/demurrage AUD 150–300 per container per day after free‑time; with 5% of 10,000 annual boxes incurring 2 extra days, this is ~AUD 150,000–300,000 per year in avoidable charges.
  • Frequency: Recurring for every congested period or schedule disruption; spikes during peak seasons and when vessels or trains are delayed.
  • Root Cause: Fragmented scheduling between port terminals, rail paths and road carriers; manual monitoring of vessel/train ETAs; lack of integrated TMS with automated alerts for cut‑off risks; limited after‑hours arrangements to clear containers promptly.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Rail and intermodal players in Australia 🇦🇺 waste AUD 300–800 per container on avoidable port and terminal storage because of uncoordinated drayage. Automation of ETA tracking, slot booking and exception alerts across modes eliminates most of these charges.

Affected Stakeholders

Intermodal operations manager, Rail planning and scheduling manager, Container transport dispatcher, Port logistics coordinator, CFO / Financial controller, Customer service / account management

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Überstunden und Leerfahrten wegen mangelhafter Drayage‑Koordination

Quantified (Soft/Logic): Industry testimony of “costly overtime charges and wasted trips” implies per‑incident costs around AUD 150–300; at 3% waste on 20,000 annual trips this is ~AUD 90,000–180,000 per year.

Nicht fakturierte Wartezeiten und Zusatzleistungen im Vor‑ und Nachlauf

Quantified (Logic): 2–5% revenue leakage from unbilled accessorials; at AUD 300 average drayage revenue on 10,000 boxes this is roughly AUD 60,000–150,000 per year.

Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch fehlerhafte und verspätete Abrechnung

Quantified (Logic): 10–20 extra DSO days, equating to ~AUD 270,000–540,000 in additional working capital tied up for a AUD 10m‑revenue intermodal drayage business.

Fehlentscheidungen bei Kapazitätsplanung und Routing im Kombiverkehr

Quantified (Logic): 3–7% avoidable operating cost on rail and drayage from suboptimal routing and capacity allocation; at AUD 5m cost base this equals ~AUD 150,000–350,000 per year.

Nicht fakturierte Standgeld- und Umpositionierungsgebühren bei Wagenbestellung

Quantified (LOGIC): Typischer Verlust 1–3 % der Umsätze aus Nebendienstleistungen, entspricht ca. AUD 200.000–500.000 p.a. für einen mittelgroßen Rail-Car-Logistiker; zusätzlich 2–4 Stunden ungeplante Rangierarbeit pro verspätetem Zugumlauf, die nicht fakturiert wird.

Überstunden und Zusatzrangieren durch ineffiziente Wagen- und Fahrzeugdisposition

Quantified (LOGIC): Zusätzliche 1–2 Std. Rangieren und Umlaufplanung pro fehlerhaft disponiertem Zug bei ca. AUD 400–600/Stunde Lok + Crew = AUD 400–1.200 pro Ereignis; bei 10–20 betroffenen Zügen/Monat ergeben sich AUD 48.000–288.000 p.a. an direkten Zusatzkosten.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence