🇦🇺Australia

Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch fehlerhafte und verspätete Abrechnung

2 verified sources

Definition

Intermodal container drayage coordination requires reconciling data from port terminals, rail services, container parks and road transport. Without a unified TMS, operators must manually compile job details, often after the fact, leading to invoicing delays and customer disputes over which moves actually occurred. Technology‑focused Australian container logistics providers stress paperless systems and integrated booking as a way to provide predictable, on‑time, low‑cost services,[2] and TMS vendors highlight centralised planning and tracking as the foundation of smooth intermodal operations.[1] By inference, operators without these capabilities experience the opposite: fragmented records, inconsistent job identifiers and missing PODs that slow billing. Logic from transport industry norms suggests that where invoices are sent weekly or monthly after manual reconciliation, Days Sales Outstanding can be 10–20 days higher than for operators with same‑day or next‑day automated billing. For a business with AUD 10 million annual revenue and 15 extra DSO days, roughly AUD 410,000 of cash (10,000,000 * 15/365) is tied up unnecessarily.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Quantified (Logic): 10–20 extra DSO days, equating to ~AUD 270,000–540,000 in additional working capital tied up for a AUD 10m‑revenue intermodal drayage business.
  • Frequency: Structural and continuous; every billing cycle is affected, especially when reconciling high‑volume port and rail activity.
  • Root Cause: Lack of integrated TMS linking rail, terminal and drayage events; manual document handling; frequent disputes over waiting time, storage and repositioning charges; reliance on paper PODs and emailed spreadsheets.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Australian intermodal operators add 10–20 extra days to their cash cycle by manually assembling multi‑leg invoices. Automating trip capture and rating can accelerate cash collection and free up hundreds of thousands of AUD in working capital.

Affected Stakeholders

Accounts receivable clerk, Finance manager / CFO, Intermodal operations manager, Customer service

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Kosten durch Hafenliegegeld und Terminallagergebühren

Quantified (Logic): Typical Australian terminal storage/demurrage AUD 150–300 per container per day after free‑time; with 5% of 10,000 annual boxes incurring 2 extra days, this is ~AUD 150,000–300,000 per year in avoidable charges.

Überstunden und Leerfahrten wegen mangelhafter Drayage‑Koordination

Quantified (Soft/Logic): Industry testimony of “costly overtime charges and wasted trips” implies per‑incident costs around AUD 150–300; at 3% waste on 20,000 annual trips this is ~AUD 90,000–180,000 per year.

Nicht fakturierte Wartezeiten und Zusatzleistungen im Vor‑ und Nachlauf

Quantified (Logic): 2–5% revenue leakage from unbilled accessorials; at AUD 300 average drayage revenue on 10,000 boxes this is roughly AUD 60,000–150,000 per year.

Fehlentscheidungen bei Kapazitätsplanung und Routing im Kombiverkehr

Quantified (Logic): 3–7% avoidable operating cost on rail and drayage from suboptimal routing and capacity allocation; at AUD 5m cost base this equals ~AUD 150,000–350,000 per year.

Nicht fakturierte Standgeld- und Umpositionierungsgebühren bei Wagenbestellung

Quantified (LOGIC): Typischer Verlust 1–3 % der Umsätze aus Nebendienstleistungen, entspricht ca. AUD 200.000–500.000 p.a. für einen mittelgroßen Rail-Car-Logistiker; zusätzlich 2–4 Stunden ungeplante Rangierarbeit pro verspätetem Zugumlauf, die nicht fakturiert wird.

Überstunden und Zusatzrangieren durch ineffiziente Wagen- und Fahrzeugdisposition

Quantified (LOGIC): Zusätzliche 1–2 Std. Rangieren und Umlaufplanung pro fehlerhaft disponiertem Zug bei ca. AUD 400–600/Stunde Lok + Crew = AUD 400–1.200 pro Ereignis; bei 10–20 betroffenen Zügen/Monat ergeben sich AUD 48.000–288.000 p.a. an direkten Zusatzkosten.

Request Deep Analysis

🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence