Nicht fakturierte Wartezeiten und Zusatzleistungen im Vor‑ und Nachlauf
Definition
Intermodal transportation involves multiple handoffs between drayage, rail and ocean carriers, with many chargeable micro‑events such as waiting time at terminals, lift‑on/lift‑off fees, rural repositioning of empties and after‑hours access. Australian logistics providers describe their offerings in terms of port‑to‑warehouse drayage, empty container repositioning, storage, maintenance and cleaning services, implying a broad catalogue of billable items around each container move.[3][4] When these activities are not captured systematically, they often remain unbilled, especially if dispatch relies on phone calls and paper manifests rather than an integrated TMS. Modern TMS providers explicitly promote centralised planning, tracking and automated rating as ways to lower costs and improve on‑time performance in intermodal chains, recognising the coordination complexity and risk of miscommunication.[1] Logic from industry practice suggests that 2–5% of drayage‑related revenue can be lost through missed accessorial charges. For an Australian operator billing AUD 300 per container average for 10,000 boxes per year, a 3% leakage represents AUD 90,000 of revenue not invoiced.
Key Findings
- Financial Impact: Quantified (Logic): 2–5% revenue leakage from unbilled accessorials; at AUD 300 average drayage revenue on 10,000 boxes this is roughly AUD 60,000–150,000 per year.
- Frequency: Ongoing, affecting daily operations whenever extra waiting, diversions or repositioning occurs outside the standard tariff.
- Root Cause: High complexity of intermodal events; manual or paper‑based trip sheets; lack of automatic linkage between event timestamps (e.g. gate‑in/gate‑out at terminals) and billing; unclear responsibility for certain charges between rail operator, drayage subcontractor and shipper.
Why This Matters
The Pitch: Australian rail‑linked drayage operators lose 2–5% of potential revenue by not billing all wait times, lift fees and repositioning moves. Automating event capture and rating ensures every chargeable activity is invoiced.
Affected Stakeholders
Billing and invoicing clerk, Finance manager, Intermodal operations manager, Customer account manager
Deep Analysis (Premium)
Financial Impact
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Current Workarounds
Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.
Get Solutions for This Problem
Full report with actionable solutions
- Solutions for this specific pain
- Solutions for all 15 industry pains
- Where to find first clients
- Pricing & launch costs
Methodology & Sources
Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.
Related Business Risks
Kosten durch Hafenliegegeld und Terminallagergebühren
Überstunden und Leerfahrten wegen mangelhafter Drayage‑Koordination
Verzögerter Zahlungseingang durch fehlerhafte und verspätete Abrechnung
Fehlentscheidungen bei Kapazitätsplanung und Routing im Kombiverkehr
Nicht fakturierte Standgeld- und Umpositionierungsgebühren bei Wagenbestellung
Überstunden und Zusatzrangieren durch ineffiziente Wagen- und Fahrzeugdisposition
Request Deep Analysis
🇦🇺 Be first to access this market's intelligence