🇧🇷Brazil

Multas LGPD por Falha em Designar Data Protection Officer (DPO)

2 verified sources

Definition

Telekall Infoservice received a warning for failure to appoint DPO (Article 41), with 30-day corrective deadline. DPO absence creates cascading liability: inability to respond to data subject requests, no breach investigation process, audit trails missing.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: R$ 7,200–R$ 14,400 per warning escalating to fine; DPO cost: R$ 36,000–120,000/year (internal hire) or R$ 3,000–10,000/month (external contractor)
  • Frequency: One-time fine per facility; DPO cost recurring annual/monthly
  • Root Cause: Misunderstanding of LGPD Article 41 scope; cost avoidance; small operators treat DPO as luxury rather than legal requirement

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Personal care brands operating without documented DPO face R$ 7,200+ fines + 30-day enforcement deadline. Appointing DPO (internal or external contractor, ~R$ 3,000–10,000/month) prevents regulatory escalation.

Affected Stakeholders

HR, Compliance Officer, General Manager

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence