🇧🇷Brazil

Multas por Violação de Requisitos ICCAT e Falhas de Reporte de Captura

2 verified sources

Definition

Brazil established digital onboard logbook system (Jan 1, 2024) but search results show 'low observer coverage' and self-declaration-based monitoring persists. ICCAT Rec 23-02 requires Brazil to pay back overharvest of bigeye tuna over 5 years, implying prior catch underreporting. Lack of adequate electronic observer data prevents real-time validation of bycatch reporting, leaving room for non-compliance.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: LOGIC Evidence: ICCAT payback obligation (exact amount not specified in results) indicates prior overharvest penalty. Estimated industry-wide reporting non-compliance fine range: R$ 5,000–25,000 per vessel per reporting cycle (quarterly); for 100+ commercial vessels, potential aggregate exposure R$ 500,000–2.5 million annually. Overharvest payback: Estimated R$ 1–3 million+ over 5-year period based on bigeye tuna quota baseline (5,944 tons referenced).
  • Frequency: Quarterly (logbook submission deadlines); annual (ICCAT reporting window)
  • Root Cause: Transition to digital logbooks (Jan 2024) incomplete; observer program (PROBORDO) suspended since 2012; inadequate real-time validation of self-declared catches

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Fishing operators risk regulatory sanctions and catch quota reductions due to inadequate bycatch reporting systems. Digital mandatory logbooks (in place since Jan 1, 2024) reduce reporting gaps but lack robust enforcement—automated bycatch validation eliminates self-declaration risk.

Affected Stakeholders

Fleet operators (tropical tuna, pelagic longline), Onboard crew (catch documentation responsibility), Port authorities (logbook validation), MPA compliance officers

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Multas por Falhas em Monitoramento e Documentação de Captura Incidental

LOGIC Evidence: Estimated penalty range R$ 10,000–50,000 per violation (typical environmental compliance penalties in Brasil for fisheries monitoring failures); potential fishery closure costs R$ 500,000–2,000,000+ (industry-wide impact if mandatory bycatch species catches exceed unreported thresholds)

Lacunas de Monitoramento e Riscos de Multas por Não-Conformidade (Monitoring Gaps & Penalty Risk)

Estimated R$ 50,000–500,000 per audit finding (SEFAZ penalty range for misreported invoices); potential license suspension (indefinite loss of revenue)

Cancelamento Automático de Autorização de Pesca por Não-Conformidade com PROPESC

R$ 500,000 – R$ 2,000,000+ per vessel (loss of annual fishing revenue); typical commercial fishing vessel generates R$ 1.5M–R$ 5M annually. Estimated 5–15% of Brazilian fishing fleet (150–450 vessels) may miss compliance deadlines based on typical government program adoption rates.

Custos de Integração Dupla de Sistemas (Preps + PesqBrasil) e Retrabalho de Vistoria

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel for initial system integration, inspector fees, and training; R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 annually for system subscriptions and data management. Estimated 200–400 manual hours per vessel per year for compliance documentation (at R$ 100–200/hour burdened = R$ 20,000–R$ 80,000 per year).

Fila de Espera para Vistoria de Embarcação e Paralização Operacional

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel per month in lost fishing revenue during idle/inspection-wait period. Estimated 150–450 vessels affected; assuming average 60-day wait per vessel = R$ 150M–R$ 675M aggregate annual revenue loss across fleet.

Ausência de Visibilidade de Dados de Conformidade PROPESC até Final de 2025

Indirect: R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000 per vessel in unplanned remediation costs and lost business opportunities due to inability to verify compliance status early. Estimated aggregate loss: R$ 50M–R$ 150M across Brazilian fishing fleet for delays in compliance planning.

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence