🇧🇷Brazil

Ausência de Visibilidade de Dados de Conformidade PROPESC até Final de 2025

1 verified sources

Definition

Search result [8] indicates government stated it would publish 'complete fishing data' by end of 2025 (after decree issuance Dec 23, 2025). This suggests compliance data tracking infrastructure was immature at program launch. Vessel operators and industry stakeholders could not verify compliance progress, identify bottlenecks, or plan remediation. Lack of transparency increases likelihood of surprise license cancellations.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Indirect: R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000 per vessel in unplanned remediation costs and lost business opportunities due to inability to verify compliance status early. Estimated aggregate loss: R$ 50M–R$ 150M across Brazilian fishing fleet for delays in compliance planning.
  • Frequency: One-time cost during program ramp-up (2025–2026); recurring risk of data delays through 2028 program end.
  • Root Cause: Government data infrastructure lag; siloed databases (MPA, SEFAZ, local authorities); lack of real-time compliance reporting API; no public transparency portal for PROPESC status.

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brazilian fishing supply chain players (vessel operators, traders, exporters) lack real-time PROPESC compliance dashboard. A shared compliance visibility portal would allow early warning of at-risk vessels and enable coordinated corrective action, preventing R$ 100M+ in canceled licenses.

Affected Stakeholders

Armadores (lack compliance visibility), Processadores de Pescado (unable to vet supplier compliance), Exportadores (reputational risk if supplier non-compliant), Analistas de Conformidade

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Cancelamento Automático de Autorização de Pesca por Não-Conformidade com PROPESC

R$ 500,000 – R$ 2,000,000+ per vessel (loss of annual fishing revenue); typical commercial fishing vessel generates R$ 1.5M–R$ 5M annually. Estimated 5–15% of Brazilian fishing fleet (150–450 vessels) may miss compliance deadlines based on typical government program adoption rates.

Custos de Integração Dupla de Sistemas (Preps + PesqBrasil) e Retrabalho de Vistoria

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel for initial system integration, inspector fees, and training; R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 annually for system subscriptions and data management. Estimated 200–400 manual hours per vessel per year for compliance documentation (at R$ 100–200/hour burdened = R$ 20,000–R$ 80,000 per year).

Fila de Espera para Vistoria de Embarcação e Paralização Operacional

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel per month in lost fishing revenue during idle/inspection-wait period. Estimated 150–450 vessels affected; assuming average 60-day wait per vessel = R$ 150M–R$ 675M aggregate annual revenue loss across fleet.

Lacunas de Monitoramento e Riscos de Multas por Não-Conformidade (Monitoring Gaps & Penalty Risk)

Estimated R$ 50,000–500,000 per audit finding (SEFAZ penalty range for misreported invoices); potential license suspension (indefinite loss of revenue)

Multas por Falhas em Monitoramento e Documentação de Captura Incidental

LOGIC Evidence: Estimated penalty range R$ 10,000–50,000 per violation (typical environmental compliance penalties in Brasil for fisheries monitoring failures); potential fishery closure costs R$ 500,000–2,000,000+ (industry-wide impact if mandatory bycatch species catches exceed unreported thresholds)

Multas por Violação de Requisitos ICCAT e Falhas de Reporte de Captura

LOGIC Evidence: ICCAT payback obligation (exact amount not specified in results) indicates prior overharvest penalty. Estimated industry-wide reporting non-compliance fine range: R$ 5,000–25,000 per vessel per reporting cycle (quarterly); for 100+ commercial vessels, potential aggregate exposure R$ 500,000–2.5 million annually. Overharvest payback: Estimated R$ 1–3 million+ over 5-year period based on bigeye tuna quota baseline (5,944 tons referenced).

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence