🇧🇷Brazil

Lacunas de Monitoramento e Riscos de Multas por Não-Conformidade (Monitoring Gaps & Penalty Risk)

1 verified sources

Definition

Brazil's Ministry of Environment and fisheries management acknowledge institutional instability and lack of current monitoring data since 2015, creating opacity in catch reporting. Landing declarations submitted without integrated validation against sales notes and tax records invite SEFAZ audits and potential infractions under Lei nº 11.959/2009 and NF-e compliance rules.

Key Findings

  • Financial Impact: Estimated R$ 50,000–500,000 per audit finding (SEFAZ penalty range for misreported invoices); potential license suspension (indefinite loss of revenue)
  • Frequency: Risk: Increasing; as SEFAZ compliance automation improves, manual documentation mismatches are more visible
  • Root Cause: Institutional instability in fisheries management; no integrated database linking landing declarations to formal sales notes; regulatory data gap (2015–2025) masks systemic underreporting

Why This Matters

The Pitch: Brasil's fisheries operators face mounting audit risk due to 10-year data gaps. Integration of landing declarations with real-time SEFAZ validation and automated species/volume cross-checks reduces penalty exposure.

Affected Stakeholders

Fisheries compliance officers, SEFAZ auditors, Fish trading companies, Export license holders

Deep Analysis (Premium)

Financial Impact

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Current Workarounds

Financial data and detailed analysis available with full access. Unlock to see exact figures, evidence sources, and actionable insights.

Unlock to reveal

Get Solutions for This Problem

Full report with actionable solutions

$99$39
  • Solutions for this specific pain
  • Solutions for all 15 industry pains
  • Where to find first clients
  • Pricing & launch costs
Get Solutions Report

Methodology & Sources

Data collected via OSINT from regulatory filings, industry audits, and verified case studies.

Evidence Sources:

Related Business Risks

Cancelamento Automático de Autorização de Pesca por Não-Conformidade com PROPESC

R$ 500,000 – R$ 2,000,000+ per vessel (loss of annual fishing revenue); typical commercial fishing vessel generates R$ 1.5M–R$ 5M annually. Estimated 5–15% of Brazilian fishing fleet (150–450 vessels) may miss compliance deadlines based on typical government program adoption rates.

Custos de Integração Dupla de Sistemas (Preps + PesqBrasil) e Retrabalho de Vistoria

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel for initial system integration, inspector fees, and training; R$ 5,000–R$ 15,000 annually for system subscriptions and data management. Estimated 200–400 manual hours per vessel per year for compliance documentation (at R$ 100–200/hour burdened = R$ 20,000–R$ 80,000 per year).

Fila de Espera para Vistoria de Embarcação e Paralização Operacional

R$ 50,000–R$ 150,000 per vessel per month in lost fishing revenue during idle/inspection-wait period. Estimated 150–450 vessels affected; assuming average 60-day wait per vessel = R$ 150M–R$ 675M aggregate annual revenue loss across fleet.

Ausência de Visibilidade de Dados de Conformidade PROPESC até Final de 2025

Indirect: R$ 50,000–R$ 500,000 per vessel in unplanned remediation costs and lost business opportunities due to inability to verify compliance status early. Estimated aggregate loss: R$ 50M–R$ 150M across Brazilian fishing fleet for delays in compliance planning.

Multas por Falhas em Monitoramento e Documentação de Captura Incidental

LOGIC Evidence: Estimated penalty range R$ 10,000–50,000 per violation (typical environmental compliance penalties in Brasil for fisheries monitoring failures); potential fishery closure costs R$ 500,000–2,000,000+ (industry-wide impact if mandatory bycatch species catches exceed unreported thresholds)

Multas por Violação de Requisitos ICCAT e Falhas de Reporte de Captura

LOGIC Evidence: ICCAT payback obligation (exact amount not specified in results) indicates prior overharvest penalty. Estimated industry-wide reporting non-compliance fine range: R$ 5,000–25,000 per vessel per reporting cycle (quarterly); for 100+ commercial vessels, potential aggregate exposure R$ 500,000–2.5 million annually. Overharvest payback: Estimated R$ 1–3 million+ over 5-year period based on bigeye tuna quota baseline (5,944 tons referenced).

Request Deep Analysis

🇧🇷 Be first to access this market's intelligence